[Issue 6321] New: stack overflow error while compiling with DMD

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6321 Summary: stack overflow error while compiling with DMD Product: D Version: 1.057 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P2

[Issue 6321] stack overflow error while compiling with DMD

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6321 --- Comment #1 from ante...@freemail.hu 2011-07-14 23:05:19 PDT --- So I get a very simple error: Stack overflow -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Issue 6321] stack overflow error while compiling with DMD

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6321 --- Comment #2 from ante...@freemail.hu 2011-07-14 23:08:47 PDT --- Version 2.054 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

A bug with DMD 2.054

While coding, I've stumbled upon this weird bug. Apparently, this code snippet right here: module program; import std.stdio; class Foo { void bar() { writeln( Foo Bar! ); } } void main() {

Re: A bug with DMD 2.054

On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:32:05 +0200, BizarreCake bizarrec...@gmail.com wrote: While coding, I've stumbled upon this weird bug. Apparently, this code snippet right here: module program; import std.stdio; class Foo { void bar() {

[Issue 6321] stack overflow error while compiling with DMD

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6321 Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrmoc...@gmx.de --- Comment

[Issue 6321] stack overflow error while compiling with DMD

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6321 --- Comment #4 from ante...@freemail.hu 2011-07-15 05:39:44 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) This doesn't help much, if you don't even specify what exact source files you've used (I mean where you got them etc). Also a stacktrace would be

[Issue 6014] rt_finalize Segmentation fault , dmd 2.053 on linux freebsd

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6014 --- Comment #10 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-07-15 05:49:10 PDT --- So here is what I can learn from this information: 1. The crash is happening on the final collection cycle when the runtime is shutting down. 2. The

[Issue 6321] stack overflow error while compiling with DMD

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6321 Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 6321] stack overflow error while compiling with DMD

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6321 --- Comment #8 from ante...@freemail.hu 2011-07-15 06:38:06 PDT --- running with -v function toString function toString function fill function clear code DFA function predict function noViableAlt function error function

[Issue 6321] stack overflow error while compiling with DMD

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6321 --- Comment #9 from Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com 2011-07-15 06:43:49 PDT --- Now that's something.. but I'm not the one to ask about these logs really. To check if it's linker try: dmd -c ... that should skip the linking stage and

[Issue 6296] Assertion failure: '0' on line 1121 in file 'glue.c'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6296 Felix Hufnagel suicide...@xited.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||suicide...@xited.de

[Issue 6296] Assertion failure: '0' on line 1121 in file 'glue.c'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6296 --- Comment #3 from Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de 2011-07-15 07:11:15 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) What about Denis' test case? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

[Issue 6296] Assertion failure: '0' on line 1121 in file 'glue.c'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6296 --- Comment #4 from Denis verylonglogin@gmail.com 2011-07-15 07:24:06 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) What about Denis' test case? If works with dmd 2.054. And I originally marked this issue as D1 only. --

[Issue 6322] New: IFTI doesn't support static arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6322 Summary: IFTI doesn't support static arrays Product: D Version: D1 D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 6322] IFTI doesn't support static arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6322 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Issue 6296] Assertion failure: '0' on line 1121 in file 'glue.c'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6296 --- Comment #5 from Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de 2011-07-15 07:39:34 PDT --- Zoadian, your test case is incomplete. Error: undefined identifier Modifier Also could you try reducing it with DustMite? -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 6296] Assertion failure: '0' on line 1121 in file 'glue.c'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6296 --- Comment #6 from Zoadian suicide...@xited.de 2011-07-15 07:45:55 PDT --- Reduced source code: http://pastebin.com/p3K8CMXF never worked with dustmite, and no time to get into it now. sry. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 6322] IFTI doesn't support static arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6322 --- Comment #2 from Denis verylonglogin@gmail.com 2011-07-15 07:47:46 PDT --- Another workaround is D2 constraints (more powerful and less buggly): import std.traits; void f(Tn)(Tn t) if(isStaticArray!Tn) { } -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 6323] New: Regression(2.054) calling opAssign inside a struct initializer

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6323 Summary: Regression(2.054) calling opAssign inside a struct initializer Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 6296] Assertion failure: '0' on line 1121 in file 'glue.c'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6296 --- Comment #8 from Zoadian suicide...@xited.de 2011-07-15 08:01:30 PDT --- they are not needed, sry, forgot to remove them. : http://pastebin.com/e7HazwDF math.d is empty; this is array.d http://pastebin.com/guBWs4h6 -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 6296] Assertion failure: '0' on line 1121 in file 'glue.c'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6296 --- Comment #9 from Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de 2011-07-15 08:06:25 PDT --- My dmd yields bug6296b.d(16): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (this) of type ModifiableInt to typeof(this) -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 6296] Assertion failure: '0' on line 1121 in file 'glue.c'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6296 --- Comment #10 from Denis verylonglogin@gmail.com 2011-07-15 08:20:32 PDT --- I'll DustMite it. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 6323] Regression(2.054) calling opAssign inside a struct initializer

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6323 kenn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kenn...@gmail.com --- Comment #1

[Issue 6321] stack overflow error while compiling with DMD

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6321 --- Comment #10 from ante...@freemail.hu 2011-07-15 09:48:11 PDT --- Hi, figured out.. It was caused by ofD:\m\antlr\backendd\plsqlparser.exe Can you see - is missing there? That caused the error. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 6324] New: ICE: .values field of enum hash errors out

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6324 Summary: ICE: .values field of enum hash errors out Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P2

[Issue 6324] ICE: .values field of enum hash errors out

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6324 --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2011-07-15 10:15:41 PDT --- Are hashes *ever* going to work at compile-time? int[string] foo = [foo:221, bar:227]; Error: non-constant expression [foo:221,bar:227] -- Configure

[Issue 6325] New: Assertion failure: '0' on line 1123 in file 'glue.c'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6325 Summary: Assertion failure: '0' on line 1123 in file 'glue.c' Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 6296] Assertion failure: '0' on line 1121 in file 'glue.c'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6296 --- Comment #11 from Denis verylonglogin@gmail.com 2011-07-15 10:24:47 PDT --- After DustMite-ing all phobos std.* sources: Issue6296 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving

[Issue 6308] Destruction of temporaries on exception causes segfault

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6308 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 6296] Assertion failure: '0' on line 1121 in file 'glue.c'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6296 --- Comment #12 from Denis verylonglogin@gmail.com 2011-07-15 10:25:52 PDT --- After DustMite-ing all phobos std.* sources: Issue6325 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving

[Issue 6326] New: [CTFE] ICE on cross-module call of function checking CTFE-ability of function with invalid switch statement

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6326 Summary: [CTFE] ICE on cross-module call of function checking CTFE-ability of function with invalid switch statement Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux

[Issue 6325] Assertion failure: '0' on line 1123 in file 'glue.c'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6325 Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 6325] Assertion failure: '0' on line 1123 in file 'glue.c'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6325 --- Comment #2 from Denis verylonglogin@gmail.com 2011-07-15 10:54:26 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) One note: the main() is unnecessary for me. For me it isn't unnecessary to call it main. It can be g, but it must contain this body.

[Issue 6325] Assertion failure: '0' on line 1123 in file 'glue.c'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6325 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2011-07-15 10:55:43 PDT --- Sorry, main() is unnecessary if I compile with -g. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 6325] Assertion failure: '0' on line 1123 in file 'glue.c'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6325 --- Comment #4 from Denis verylonglogin@gmail.com 2011-07-15 10:57:57 PDT --- Corrected version of my previous comment: For me it isn't necessary to call it main (if compiling without -g). It can be f or g, but it must contain S.f(); in

[Issue 6317] ICE on struct literal of nested struct

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6317 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6327] Internal error: ..\ztc\cgcv.c 206

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6327 --- Comment #1 from ante...@freemail.hu 2011-07-15 12:52:04 PDT --- It happens only if I use -g switch -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 6327] New: Internal error: ..\ztc\cgcv.c 206

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6327 Summary: Internal error: ..\ztc\cgcv.c 206 Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component:

[Issue 6327] Internal error: ..\ztc\cgcv.c 206

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6327 --- Comment #2 from ante...@freemail.hu 2011-07-15 13:08:37 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1007) It shows the stack in the bottom right corner. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 6327] Internal error: ..\ztc\cgcv.c 206

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6327 --- Comment #3 from ante...@freemail.hu 2011-07-15 13:41:23 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1008) trace file of execution until failure -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving

[Issue 6328] New: Functions using lazy argument cannot be inferred as @safe

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6328 Summary: Functions using lazy argument cannot be inferred as @safe Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

[Issue 6325] Assertion failure: '0' on line 1123 in file 'glue.c'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6325 Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrmoc...@gmx.de --- Comment

[Issue 6316] Regression(2.054): Class downcast is rejected in @safe code

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6316 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6329] New: Out of range exceptions not thrown in certain cases

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6329 Summary: Out of range exceptions not thrown in certain cases Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: regression Priority:

[Issue 6097] SSSE3 instructions in inline assembler cause error using DMD from git master

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6097 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6308] Destruction of temporaries on exception causes segfault

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6308 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2011-07-15 21:48:28 PDT --- Minimized testcase: struct C { this(int) { throw new Exception(Oops!); } ~this() { } int bar() { return 1; } }