[Issue 6371] Small improvements to aid auto-building DMD from git
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6371 --- Comment #2 from Nick Sabalausky 2011-07-23 17:10:03 PDT --- By "pre-built libs" I don't mean phobos or druntime. Just the other ones for which the source isn't in git. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6371] Small improvements to aid auto-building DMD from git
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6371 --- Comment #1 from Nick Sabalausky 2011-07-23 17:08:56 PDT --- Also the pre-built libs should be in version control. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6371] New: Small improvements to aid auto-building DMD from git
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6371 Summary: Small improvements to aid auto-building DMD from git Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: cbkbbej...@mailinator.com --- Comment #0 from Nick Sabalausky 2011-07-23 16:57:59 PDT --- - Smaller issue: sc.ini and dmd.conf should exist in version control - Currently a big pain in the ass: In dmd's win32.mak, "CC=\dm\bin\dmc" should be changed to "CC=dmc" -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 596] Support array, arrayliteral and struct in switch and case
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=596 --- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-07-23 12:15:36 PDT --- Regarding tuple unpacking see also issue 6365 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6365] AutoTupleDeclaration
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6365 --- Comment #14 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-07-23 12:14:23 PDT --- See also the idea of switching on tuples, in issue 596 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6365] AutoTupleDeclaration
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6365 --- Comment #13 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-07-23 12:04:19 PDT --- Tuple slicing and other situations create tuples with 1 items or 0 items: auto t = tuple(1.5, "foo"); auto t1 = t[0 .. 1]; auto t2 = t[0 .. 0]; In python they are written: (x,) or x, () For the 1-tuple D may do use the same syntax (but here parentheses are requires, while in Python they are optional): auto (x,) = [10]; auto (y,) = t1; What about 0-length tuples? int[0] a; () = a; () = t2; -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6370] [RDMD] Cannot compile with etc.c.sqlite3
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6370 --- Comment #4 from Michal Minich 2011-07-23 11:08:19 PDT --- No prob, I should pay more attention. (is the '3' really needed, I keep forgetting it) Now it compiles ok, but fails to link with rdmd, I guess this is another problem, but I suppose when dmd handles it, rdmd should too. Command: rdmd -L-ldl -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.a -w -debug -g Main.d Output: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.a(sqlite3.o):(.rodata+0x2950): multiple definition of `sqlite3_version' /tmp/.rdmd/rdmd-Main.d-A0E982B2A9146FCDB47E9452DF01F7A4/Main.d.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here /usr/bin/ld: Warning: size of symbol `sqlite3_version' changed from 8 in /tmp/.rdmd/rdmd-Main.d-A0E982B2A9146FCDB47E9452DF01F7A4/Main.d.o to 6 in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.a(sqlite3.o) /usr/bin/ld: sqlite3_temp_directory: TLS definition in /tmp/.rdmd/rdmd-Main.d-A0E982B2A9146FCDB47E9452DF01F7A4/Main.d.o section .tbss mismatches non-TLS definition in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.a(sqlite3.o) section .bss /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.a: could not read symbols: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status --- errorlevel 1 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6370] [RDMD] Cannot compile with etc.c.sqlite3
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6370 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Olshansky 2011-07-23 10:56:32 PDT --- Sorry, I've botched it, that supposed to be etc.c.sqlite3, just like you import it -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6370] [RDMD] Cannot compile with etc.c.sqlite3
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6370 --- Comment #2 from Michal Minich 2011-07-23 10:50:07 PDT --- dmd handles it well, rdmd ends with similar error module etc.c.sqlite from file dmd2/linux/bin64/../../src/phobos/etc/c/sqlite3.d conflicts with another module sqlite from file dmd2/linux/bin64/../../src/phobos/etc/c/sqlite3.d -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6370] [RDMD] Cannot compile with etc.c.sqlite3
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6370 Dmitry Olshansky changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmitry.o...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Olshansky 2011-07-23 10:42:38 PDT --- The root of the problem seems to be the wrong module name in etc/c/sqlite.d Try to change it's first line to: module etc.c.sqlite; -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6361] To avoid a newline in multi-line strings
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6361
--- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-07-23 09:12:53 PDT ---
Code by Andrej Mitrovic:
http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=141106
It shows better why this very small change in D language is not handy to do
with a library solution:
import std.algorithm;
import std.stdio;
import std.string;
string stripNewlines(string text)
{
auto x = text.countUntil("\n");
auto y = text.lastIndexOf("\n");
return text[x+1..y];
}
template EOS(string text)
{
enum EOS = stripNewlines(text);
}
void main()
{
writeln(EOS!"
- First item: 150
- Second item: 200
- Third item: 105
");
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6365] AutoTupleDeclaration
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6365 --- Comment #12 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-07-23 09:03:24 PDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #7) > > (auto i, j) = tuple(1.2, "a"); > > > > Then the syntax can be later extended to: > > > > (double i, string j) = tuple(1.2, "a"); > > > > Anyway, we should wait for Walter to weigh in. Thanks Kenji for this work. > > How about this syntax? > auto (i, j) = tuple(1.2, "a"); > (double, string) (i, j) = tuple(1.2, "a"); It's not ugly, but I think this looks a bit better: (double i, string j) = tuple(1.2, "a"); Also because it's closer to (more consistent with) the currently used definition syntax: alias Tuple!(double,"i", string,"j") T1; auto t1 = T1(1.2, "a"); If eventually the definition syntax too will become built-in, then you will have something like: alias (double i, string j) T2; auto t2 = T2(1.2, "a"); -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6365] AutoTupleDeclaration
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6365 --- Comment #11 from Kenji Hara 2011-07-23 08:33:10 PDT --- Oops, I forgot to paste experimental patch link. https://github.com/9rnsr/dmd/compare/expandTuples...declarationTuple -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6365] AutoTupleDeclaration
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6365 --- Comment #10 from Kenji Hara 2011-07-23 08:28:08 PDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > One simple syntactic matter is that we can't extend the existing syntax to > work > with specified types. That means the user must use "auto" but cannot specify > the types of the variables defined. > > To allow that in the future, we need to move the paren before the auto: > > (auto i, j) = tuple(1.2, "a"); > > Then the syntax can be later extended to: > > (double i, string j) = tuple(1.2, "a"); > > Anyway, we should wait for Walter to weigh in. Thanks Kenji for this work. How about this syntax? auto (i, j) = tuple(1.2, "a"); (double, string) (i, j) = tuple(1.2, "a"); -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6370] New: [RDMD] Cannot compile with etc.c.sqlite3
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6370
Summary: [RDMD] Cannot compile with etc.c.sqlite3
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: michal.min...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Michal Minich 2011-07-23 08:08:08
PDT ---
rdmd will not compile program that imports etc.c.sqlite3 while dmd with the
same command line will.
test.d
import etc.c.sqlite3;
void main () {};
cmdline
rdmd test.d -c
Error:
module sqlite3_bindings from file
dmd2/linux/bin64/../../src/phobos/etc/c/sqlite3.d conflicts with another module
sqlite3_bindings from file dmd2/linux/bin64/../../src/phobos/etc/c/sqlite3.d
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6365] AutoTupleDeclaration
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6365 --- Comment #9 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-07-23 07:48:46 PDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Regarding mismatch in the number of elements, we may actually do good to > disable > > TypeTuple!(int, int) f = 10; > assert(f[0] == 10); > assert(f[1] == 10); > > instead of striving to be consistent with it. This was right my point. On this I have opened bug 6367 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6365] AutoTupleDeclaration
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6365 --- Comment #8 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2011-07-23 07:33:33 PDT --- Regarding mismatch in the number of elements, we may actually do good to disable TypeTuple!(int, int) f = 10; assert(f[0] == 10); assert(f[1] == 10); instead of striving to be consistent with it. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6365] AutoTupleDeclaration
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6365 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||and...@metalanguage.com --- Comment #7 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2011-07-23 07:32:23 PDT --- One simple syntactic matter is that we can't extend the existing syntax to work with specified types. That means the user must use "auto" but cannot specify the types of the variables defined. To allow that in the future, we need to move the paren before the auto: (auto i, j) = tuple(1.2, "a"); Then the syntax can be later extended to: (double i, string j) = tuple(1.2, "a"); Anyway, we should wait for Walter to weigh in. Thanks Kenji for this work. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6369] alias this doesn't work with initializer
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6369 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-07-23 06:10:30 PDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > D has tuple declaration like follows: > > TypeTuple!(int, int) f = 10; > assert(f[0] == 10); > assert(f[1] == 10); See bug 6367 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6369] New: alias this doesn't work with initializer
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6369 Summary: alias this doesn't work with initializer Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: k.hara...@gmail.com --- Comment #0 from Kenji Hara 2011-07-23 06:07:33 PDT --- D has tuple declaration like follows: TypeTuple!(int, int) f = 10; assert(f[0] == 10); assert(f[1] == 10); But, alias this tuple is not expanded automatically: TypeTuple!(int, string) f = tuple(10, "str"); assert(f[0] == 10); assert(f[1] == "str"); And, built-in tuple also should allow on initializer: TypeTuple!(int, string) f = TypeTuple!(10, "str"); assert(f[0] == 10); assert(f[1] == "str"); -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6368] New: Too many error messages for a missing );
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6368
Summary: Too many error messages for a missing );
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Comment #0 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-07-23 05:31:17 PDT ---
A wrong program that lacks a closing );
void main() {
foo(
}
In my opinion it generates many too many error messages, DMD 2.054:
test.d(3): expression expected, not '}'
test.d(4): found 'EOF' when expecting ','
test.d(4): expression expected, not 'EOF'
test.d(4): found 'EOF' when expecting ','
test.d(4): expression expected, not 'EOF'
test.d(4): found 'EOF' when expecting ','
test.d(4): expression expected, not 'EOF'
test.d(4): found 'EOF' when expecting ','
test.d(4): expression expected, not 'EOF'
test.d(4): found 'EOF' when expecting ','
test.d(4): expression expected, not 'EOF'
test.d(4): found 'EOF' when expecting ','
test.d(4): expression expected, not 'EOF'
test.d(4): found 'EOF' when expecting ','
test.d(4): expression expected, not 'EOF'
test.d(4): found 'EOF' when expecting ','
test.d(4): expression expected, not 'EOF'
test.d(4): found 'EOF' when expecting ','
test.d(4): expression expected, not 'EOF'
test.d(4): found 'EOF' when expecting ','
test.d(4): expression expected, not 'EOF'
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6366] alias this doesn't work with foreach range.front
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6366 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-07-23 05:34:02 PDT --- See also: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6365#c4 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6365] AutoTupleDeclaration
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6365
--- Comment #6 from Kenji Hara 2011-07-23 05:27:14 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Optionally there is the foreach use case too. A possible syntax:
>
> auto array = [tuple(1,"foo"), tuple(2,"bar")];
> foreach (tuple(id, name); array) {}
I filed an issue about alias this + foreach range.front behavior.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6366
Please comment there.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6367] New: Multi-assignment for typetuples is bad
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6367
Summary: Multi-assignment for typetuples is bad
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Comment #0 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-07-23 05:28:42 PDT ---
This is a spinoff of issue 6365
This program compiles and runs with no errors (it doesn't assert), DMD 2.054:
import std.typetuple;
void main() {
TypeTuple!(int, int) f = 10;
assert(f[0] == 10);
assert(f[1] == 10);
}
The idea of carring this broken TypeTuple semantics over to Tuples too is icky.
I instead suggest to turn this into a compile-time error.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6366] New: alias this doesn't work with foreach range.front
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6366
Summary: alias this doesn't work with foreach range.front
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: k.hara...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Kenji Hara 2011-07-23 05:24:39 PDT ---
This is similar bug2781, but different.
If range.front is alias this tuple (like std.typecons.Tuple), foreach statement
does not expand it automatically.
Example:
auto r = zip(sequence!"n", "hello");
// typeof(r.front) == Tuple!(int, char)
foreach (i, ch; r)
{
if (i == 0) assert(ch == 'h');
if (i == 1) assert(ch == 'e');
if (i == 2) assert(ch == 'l');
if (i == 3) assert(ch == 'l');
if (i == 4) assert(ch == 'o');
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6365] AutoTupleDeclaration
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6365 --- Comment #5 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-07-23 05:23:06 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > This is keeping consistent feature. > Current D allow compilation of following code: > > TypeTuple!(int, int) f = 10; > assert(f[0] == 10); > assert(f[1] == 10); I didn't know this, thank you. So the semantics of TypeTuple is broken. This design mistake must not be carried over to Tuples too. Consistancy with a so wrong design is like shooting yourself in the foot and makes this whole enhancement request of negative value. It's better to fix this TypeTuple design bug instead. I will file an enhancement request on it. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6365] AutoTupleDeclaration
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6365
--- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-07-23 05:18:55 PDT ---
Optionally there is the foreach use case too. A possible syntax:
auto array = [tuple(1,"foo"), tuple(2,"bar")];
foreach (tuple(id, name); array) {}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6365] AutoTupleDeclaration
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6365 --- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara 2011-07-23 05:17:57 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #0) > > > auto (n1, n2) = 100; // non tuple initializer > > assert(n1 == 100); > > assert(n2 == 100); > > This *must* be a compile-time error. This is keeping consistent feature. Current D allow compilation of following code: TypeTuple!(int, int) f = 10; assert(f[0] == 10); assert(f[1] == 10); -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6365] AutoTupleDeclaration
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6365 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-07-23 05:14:44 PDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > auto (n1, n2) = 100; // non tuple initializer > assert(n1 == 100); > assert(n2 == 100); This *must* be a compile-time error. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6365] AutoTupleDeclaration
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6365 --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2011-07-23 05:08:51 PDT --- Also we can allow a static array on initializer like follows: auto (x, y) = [10, 20]; assert(x == 10); assert(y == 20); But, it has a bit problem. auto (x, y) = [10, 20, 30]; // interpreted as non tuple initializer assert(x == [10, 20, 30]); assert(y == [10, 20, 30]); auto (x, y) = [10]; // interpreted as non tuple initializer assert(x == [10]); assert(y == [10]); It is not inconsistent, but less useful. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6365] New: AutoTupleDeclaration
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6365
Summary: AutoTupleDeclaration
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: k.hara...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Kenji Hara 2011-07-23 05:00:58 PDT ---
Syntax:
'auto' '(' Identifier [',' Identifier ...] ')' '=' Initializer ';'
Example:
auto (num, msg) = TypeTuple!(1, "hello"); // built-in tuple
assert(num == 1);
assert(msg == "hello");
auto (name, age) = tuple("John", 10); // library tuple (= alias this tuple)
assert(name == "John");
assert(age == 10);
auto (n1, n2) = 100; // non tuple initializer
assert(n1 == 100);
assert(n2 == 100);
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6364] New: Static struct's destructor called on exit of function
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6364
Summary: Static struct's destructor called on exit of function
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Andrej Mitrovic 2011-07-22
22:08:18 PDT ---
import std.stdio;
void main()
{
test();
test();
}
struct Foo
{
int state = 1;
~this()
{
state = 0;
}
}
void test()
{
static Foo foo;
writeln(foo.state);
}
Prints:
1
0
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
