[Issue 6306] Regression(2.054): [CTFE] Strange behavior of indirect recursive call in CTFE

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6306 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[CTFE] Strange behavior of |Regression(2.054): [CTFE]

[Issue 6306] [CTFE] Strange behavior of indirect recursive call in CTFE

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6306 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Issue 6389] New: Segfault(dsymbol.c): deprecated @disable

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6389 Summary: Segfault(dsymbol.c): deprecated @disable Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 6390] New: [CTFE] Struct constructor fails to call another method

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6390 Summary: [CTFE] Struct constructor fails to call another method Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid

[Issue 5936] Regression(2.050): Segfault when forward-referencing pure auto-return member function with parameter.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5936 --- Comment #4 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-07-27 11:48:10 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #1) This patch only fixes 5844. In git master this becomes Internal error: toir.c 190 with or without your patch. As of

[Issue 5667] [GSoC] clear does not call destructors on structs embedded in structs

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5667 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k.hara...@gmail.com

[Issue 6391] New: Line-less error when passing the '.im' of floating pointer value by reference

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6391 Summary: Line-less error when passing the '.im' of floating pointer value by reference Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Issue 5667] [GSoC] clear does not call destructors on structs embedded in structs

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5667 --- Comment #7 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-07-27 12:35:13 PDT --- Yes, clearly that is a good path. But my question is, why __dtor not the same as destroy? Is there any reason to call ~this() without calling all the

[Issue 6345] A different kind of vector operation

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6345 --- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-07-27 13:56:06 PDT --- Another possible purpose. Given this matrix: auto M = new double[][](10, 20); This: M[][1] = 1.0; Means: foreach (row; p) row[1] = 1.0; This replaces some usages

[Issue 6373] More descriptive 'hidden by X is deprecated' error

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6373 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-07-27 18:50:27 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1013) diff to toobj.c A kind of patch over dmd 2.054, probably wrong. Be kind. -- Configure issuemail: