[Issue 6606] RefCounted doesn't work with unions due to use of format

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6606 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #4

[Issue 6608] Tuple field is not escaped

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6608 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #1

[Issue 6323] Regression(2.054) calling opAssign inside a struct initializer

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6323 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6584] ICE on large version number/debug level

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6584 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Issue 6337] [CTFE] ICE when touching member variable of struct during CTFE

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6337 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||soy...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 6323] Regression(2.054) calling opAssign inside a struct initializer

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6323 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3

[Issue 3180] Covariance of delegates/function pointers

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3180 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch |

[Issue 5766] undefined reference to `_D3std4bind12__ModuleInfoZ'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5766 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6014] rt_finalize Segmentation fault , dmd 2.053 on linux freebsd

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6014 --- Comment #16 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-09-06 01:24:59 PDT --- *** Issue 5766 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 6608] Tuple field is not escaped

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6608 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 3267] int delegate() should be implicitly castable to const(int) delegate()

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3267 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3180] Covariance of delegates/function pointers

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3180 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au

[Issue 3180] Covariance of delegates/function pointers

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3180 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch

[Issue 3180] Covariance of delegates/function pointers

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3180 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch

[Issue 5590] ICE when using .values on enum which is associative array

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5590 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Issue 6606] RefCounted doesn't work with unions due to use of format

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6606 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3813] Bad writeln of arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3813 --- Comment #24 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-09-06 02:31:57 PDT --- (In reply to comment #23) Why are we spending our valuable time on this? Because I print tuples often, and I'd like to see this situation improved. See also:

[Issue 6377] std.conv.to should check range when changing signedness

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6377 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6610] New: opAssign when copy-ing array

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6610 Summary: opAssign when copy-ing array Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component:

[Issue 4977] cannot use nothrow or pure with Rebindable

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4977 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6611] New: array[]++ and array[]-- too?

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6611 Summary: array[]++ and array[]-- too? Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component:

[Issue 6612] New: Associative arrays with associative array keys literals

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6612 Summary: Associative arrays with associative array keys literals Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords:

[Issue 6611] array[]++ and array[]-- too?

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6611 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 5665] DmdScript Bug, Program.compile is very slow

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5665 Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 6611] array[]++ and array[]-- too?

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6611 --- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-09-06 10:22:34 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) This line implies the following a[]++ = (auto tmp = a[].dup, ++a[], tmp) Do we really want it to be this easy to do? I understand. If doing

[Issue 6611] array[]++ and array[]-- too?

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6611 --- Comment #3 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-09-07 03:41:35 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) I understand. If doing this is not good, then I suggest to turn this into a diagnostic enhancement request. So given code like this: It's

[Issue 6607] critical_.d and critical.c use double check locking the wrong way

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6607 Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Issue 4890] GC.collect() deadlocks multithreaded program.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4890 Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Issue 6045] Unable to demangle symbols

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6045 Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 6613] New: Can't use empty tuple as default value for variadic template function parameter

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6613 Summary: Can't use empty tuple as default value for variadic template function parameter Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Issue 6607] critical_.d and critical.c use double check locking the wrong way

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6607 --- Comment #2 from deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com 2011-09-06 14:33:22 PDT --- Actually, even if the compiler do not reorder that, modern CPU can, and this is out of control, unless specific precautions are used. It's even more problematic now

[Issue 6615] New: Implement optimization for downcast to final class

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6615 Summary: Implement optimization for downcast to final class Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Issue 6615] Implement optimization for downcast to final class

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6615 --- Comment #1 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2011-09-06 16:44:26 PDT --- hm, ok. It seems that druntime actually does shortcut and most of the difference boils down to the fact that the druntime function cannot be inlined... -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 5980] foreach element of a type tuple of string literals is not implicitly convertible to immutable(char)*

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5980 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6518] break inside a static foreach inside a switch

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6518 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch, rejects-valid