[Issue 4316] this(this) cannot become safe function.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4316 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch, rejects-valid OS/Version|Windows |All --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2011-10-29 00:05:16 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/480 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6443] [GSoC] Catching exceptions in fibers broken on Windows/Linux x86_64
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6443 klickverbot c...@klickverbot.at changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #5 from klickverbot c...@klickverbot.at 2011-10-29 00:56:55 PDT --- Fixed in 2.056. Sean, do you really insist on not closing �your� bugs until the release is out? Immediately closing them after the fix is in would reduce the chance of bugs accidentally staying open, and help Walter compile the changelog. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6862] New: std.math: implement toRadians and fromRadians
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6862
Summary: std.math: implement toRadians and fromRadians
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2011-10-29
13:05:42 PDT ---
Simplest case w/o float/real specializations:
double toRadians(double degrees)
{
return degrees * (PI / 180.0);
}
double fromRadians(double radians)
{
return radians * (180.0 / PI);
}
I think this belongs in std.math? The second function could be called
'toDegrees', but I think this name might be a little ambiguous.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6862] std.math: implement toRadians and fromRadians
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6862 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-10-29 13:12:30 PDT --- See bug 5900 :-( -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6862] std.math: implement toRadians and fromRadians
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6862 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2011-10-29 13:34:29 PDT --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 5900 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5900] std.math.radians(), std.math.degrees()
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5900 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2011-10-29 13:34:29 PDT --- *** Issue 6862 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6856] Preconditions are not inherited
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6856 Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@iname.com --- Comment #1 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2011-10-29 18:20:20 PDT --- http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/dbc.html If a function in a derived class overrides a function in its super class, then only one of the in contracts of the function and its base functions must be satisfied. Overriding functions then becomes a process of loosening the in contracts. A function without an in contract means that any values of the function parameters are allowed. On an override, the semantics of an in contract are to _add_ to what is a legal call of the method. And the absence of an in contract in a function definition is really syntactic sugar for an empty in contract. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
