http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7734
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from yebb
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4018
d...@dawgfoto.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@dawgfoto.de
--- Comment #4 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4018
d...@dawgfoto.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chang...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 fr
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5686
d...@dawgfoto.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7723
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7723
--- Comment #11 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-03-20 20:53:44 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> That's definitely wrong. map and filter aren't @properties.
They are, with a different definition of property :)
--
Configure issuemail: http
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7744
Summary: Crash with forward reference in string mixin
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Co
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7743
Summary: Parsing problem with nothrow delegate
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7713
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7723
--- Comment #7 from Adam D. Ruppe 2012-03-20
18:53:22 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I disagree. It's more an issue of what @property is for. Is it simply to try
> and enable a syntax where you don't need parens if you don't feel like it,
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7723
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan M Davis 2012-03-20 18:14:59
PDT ---
It seems to me that you're not looking for a property. You just think that the
empty parens are annoying and don't want to have to use them, and property
syntax is the only way t
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7723
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan M Davis 2012-03-20 18:29:13
PDT ---
> This issue is another piece of evidence that -property is a mistake and should
> never be enforced.
I disagree. It's more an issue of what @property is for. Is it simply to tr
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6253
--- Comment #7 from Stewart Gordon 2012-03-20 15:45:53 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Does (In reply to comment #4)
>> AA keys don't have to be immutable, they just have to be a type
>> that implicitly converts to immutable. This is the s
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7730
--- Comment #9 from Stewart Gordon 2012-03-20 15:29:55 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #4)
>> I wouldn't really exaggerate that. Actually using a find/sed
>> expression thats quite easy to fix.
>
> That might be the c
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7723
Jonathan M Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com
--- Comment #1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7713
--- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-03-20 14:12:18 PDT ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/8dba679462b3ee58bb589aa7a6b28135191c09be
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7732
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-03-20 13:39:28 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/5a090eceffae47a3b64f0d64010bec948bdb842
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7423
--- Comment #10 from Don 2012-03-20 12:35:34 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > (In reply to comment #7)
> > Hex literals are supposed to be ints, not uints. The code should work
> > anyway,
> > because x is a uint
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7742
Summary: 'More initializers than fields' error with correct
number of fields
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7423
--- Comment #9 from Adam Wilson 2012-03-20 09:38:56 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > I initially thought something along the same lines and tried it on a single
> > statement like so:
> >
> > x = (cast(unit)((x&0
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7733
--- Comment #2 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx 2012-03-20 06:50:03 PDT ---
TDPL references:
p.378: "Postincrement and postdecrement are generated automatically from
preincrement and predecrement, as described in � 12.2.2 on page 369.
p.369: descri
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7741
Summary: getHash inconsistent for const(char)[] vs. char[] and
string
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5176
--- Comment #11 from deadalnix 2012-03-20 04:50:47 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > One possibility is to allow arbitrary sizes but have the compiler insert
> > checks
> > for all field accesses through pointer
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5176
--- Comment #10 from Michel Fortin 2012-03-20
07:45:08 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> One possibility is to allow arbitrary sizes but have the compiler insert
> checks
> for all field accesses through pointer or reference when the field o
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5176
--- Comment #9 from Michel Fortin 2012-03-20
07:14:52 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Wouldn't it also be possible to additionally protect memory up to the desired
> @safe object size limit during application startup?
That'll work only if
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7739
Dmitry Olshansky changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7423
--- Comment #8 from Don 2012-03-20 01:42:17 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I initially thought something along the same lines and tried it on a single
> statement like so:
>
> x = (cast(unit)((x&0x_)>>2)) + (x&0x_);
That w
27 matches
Mail list logo
