http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8234
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
--- Comment #1 from Don 2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7940
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||CTFE, wrong-code
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8305
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8305
Summary: DMD Segfaults on Certain Imports
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
Component: D
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8304
Summary: writeln of empty Nullables too
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: enhancement
Pri
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8303
Summary: [ICE] (interpret.c, line 100) Maybe caused by a
closure
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5570
--- Comment #28 from Walter Bright 2012-06-26
11:19:22 PDT ---
My intention is to have the following all behave the same way:
delegate
struct S { void*, void* }
void*[2]
for parameter passing. The same goes for dynamic arrays. Tha
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5570
--- Comment #27 from klickverbot 2012-06-26 09:33:02 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #26)
> (In reply to comment #25)
> > Sigh – seems like I was not exactly right about how GDC and LDC are handling
> > arrays. Instead of treating them like the e
Direct replying to this news group/mailing list is no meaning.
You must post these test case from the form in bugzilla.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8285
Kenji hara
2012/6/25 Max Samukha :
> Another test case. The error is different but the root cause must be the
> same.
>
> str
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8301
timon.g...@gmx.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||timon.g...@gmx.ch
Summary
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5570
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuc...@ubuntu.com
--- Comment #26 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8302
Summary: Documentation of dirEntries in std.file is incomplete
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8301
Summary: Exception not caught when a big array is allocated
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
C
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5570
--- Comment #25 from klickverbot 2012-06-26 04:48:42 PDT
---
Sigh – seems like I was not exactly right about how GDC and LDC are handling
arrays. Instead of treating them like the equivalent struct, they are treated
as if length and pointer we
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8053
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rswhi...@googlemail.com
--- Comment #1 fr
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8300
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8106
--- Comment #17 from Manu 2012-06-26 01:06:12 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> 2. adding a "parameters" to traits, so that:
>
> __traits(parameters, foo)
>
> returns a tuple that includes types, identifiers, and default values (like th
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8300
Summary: Stack overflow with alias this
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DM
18 matches
Mail list logo