[Issue 6178] Struct inside the AA are not init correctly

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6178 --- Comment #13 from Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru 2013-01-16 01:18:30 PST --- Well, seems in 2.061 the behavior was changed. Without any options, the output is like: -1154412584 opAssign called (big value) 1 dtor called -1154412584 dtor

[Issue 9325] New: writeln of const class instance

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9325 Summary: writeln of const class instance Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Issue 6178] Struct inside the AA are not init correctly

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6178 --- Comment #14 from Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com 2013-01-16 01:46:18 PST --- (In reply to comment #13) Well, seems in 2.061 the behavior was changed. Without any options, the output is like: -1154412584 opAssign called (big

[Issue 9322] Internal error: ../ztc/cod1.c 3510 with SIMD on OSX 32

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9322 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 4269] Regression(2.031): invalid type accepted if evaluated while errors are gagged

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4269 --- Comment #28 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-01-16 01:52:33 PST --- Commit pushed to dmd-1.x at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 6178] Struct inside the AA are not init correctly

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6178 --- Comment #15 from Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru 2013-01-16 02:18:45 PST --- (In reply to comment #14) This is shitty but I'll use -release for the moment. BTW it seems to require both module with struct *and* the one where AA is used

[Issue 9326] New: writeln to simply show pointed data

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9326 Summary: writeln to simply show pointed data Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Issue 9326] writeln to simply show pointed data

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9326 Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 2485] non-static initialization of struct using static initializer syntax generates wrong code

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2485 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 8741] wrong code for struct member initialized using struct constructor

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8741 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||slud...@outerproduct.org

[Issue 4269] Regression(2.031): invalid type accepted if evaluated while errors are gagged

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4269 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Issue 9326] writeln to simply show pointed data

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9326 --- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-01-16 03:11:59 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) Thank you for your comment. I don't think that stuffing various debugging trickery into writeln is a good idea. I keep hearing similar comments

[Issue 9097] Value range propagation to disable some array bound tests

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9097 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull CC|

[Issue 9326] writeln to simply show pointed data

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9326 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-01-16 04:48:06 PST --- Beside dynamic arrays, associative arrays and enums, D writeln is able to print lazy ranges, so writeln is already rather capable: import std.stdio, std.range; void main()

[Issue 9326] writeln to simply show pointed data

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9326 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com 2013-01-16 04:57:33 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) Thank you for your comment. I don't think that stuffing various debugging trickery into writeln is

[Issue 5922] immutable and static variables usage in asm{}

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5922 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 9326] writeln to simply show pointed data

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9326 --- Comment #5 from Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com 2013-01-16 05:11:45 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) If you think this enhancement request is not a good idea, you must explain why. I have explained why it's a handy thing to

[Issue 9320] Non-POD status of a struct correlated to bad inlining.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9320 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Sicard dran...@gmail.com 2013-01-16 05:19:13 PST --- Note, LDC produces equivalent code in both cases: --- fldtbyte ptr 028h[RSP] fldtbyte ptr 018h[RSP] fldST(0) fmul

[Issue 6319] debug's relaxed purity does not apply to nested scopes

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6319 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com

[Issue 6319] debug's relaxed purity does not apply to nested scopes

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6319 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #5 from

[Issue 6408] string[].init gives a wrong type

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6408 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull CC|

[Issue 6783] Implicit cast to immutable from pure function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6783 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 8408] Purity calculation should be improved

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8408 --- Comment #12 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2013-01-17 01:07:31 EST --- *** Issue 6783 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 9230] Incorrect implicit immutable conversion occurs in pure function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9230 --- Comment #8 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2013-01-17 01:11:52 EST --- Issue 8998 is related -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 8408] Purity calculation should be improved

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8408 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 8357] ICE instantiating template inside of a unittest

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8357 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 8357] ICE instantiating template inside of a unittest

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8357 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |WORKSFORME -- Configure

[Issue 5038] Change class 'invariant' syntax to emulate 'unittest'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5038 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 8128] unittest blocks should be allowed in interfaces

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8128 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6566] Length of run-time constant array

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6566 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6708] immutable ref implicit cast to const ref

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6708 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull CC|

[Issue 6794] ICE(expression.c): with inout

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6794 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6795] ICE(cgcs.c): Incrementing an enum array item

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6795 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com

[Issue 7225] immutable argument by const ref

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7225 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6708] immutable ref implicit cast to const ref

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6708 --- Comment #2 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2013-01-17 02:06:19 EST --- *** Issue 7225 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 7226] Refused pure nothrow ctor syntax

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7226 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 7570] Missing error in ctfe for dereferencing a pointer passed as a parameter

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7570 --- Comment #3 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2013-01-17 02:11:46 EST --- Now fails with: DMD v2.062 DEBUG testx.d(4):called from here: contains(froogler) testx.d(4): Error: static assert (!contains(froogler)) is not evaluatable at

[Issue 7837] A refused opBinaryRight(in) with bad error message

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7837 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3905] Wrong error message with wrong opBinary(in)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3905 --- Comment #6 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2013-01-17 02:14:10 EST --- *** Issue 7837 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 8100] [ICE] with templated subclassing

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8100 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 8111] [ICE] With templated recursive return-inferred function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8111 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 8374] One missed array literal interpretation as int[2]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8374 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 8149] Possible forward reference mistake

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8149 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 8690] Can't access a global enum size_t from a pure function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8690 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com

[Issue 9107] Value Range Analysis with uint and byte

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9107 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 6654] Fixed-sized array length not accessible in pure functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6654 --- Comment #1 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2013-01-17 02:34:55 EST --- *** Issue 8690 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 8690] Can't access a global enum size_t from a pure function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8690 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 8583] [64 bit] AA ushort[dchar] byValue range is corrupted on x86_64

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8583 Simon Harris pearfa...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 7226] Refused pure nothrow ctor syntax

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7226 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6677] static this attributes position

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6677 --- Comment #1 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2013-01-17 02:37:10 EST --- *** Issue 7226 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 9326] writeln to simply show pointed data

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9326 --- Comment #7 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-01-16 09:54:23 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) What Kenji did was a better printing for ranges in general that is far more powerful (and better integrated) then arrays. Kenji (with help from

[Issue 6408] string[].init gives a wrong type

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6408 --- Comment #7 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-01-16 09:58:21 PST --- (In reply to comment #6) I'm not sure T* can be done like this, but it also produces an error instead of being ignored silently. Thank you. In the unittests have you

[Issue 5038] Change class 'invariant' syntax to emulate 'unittest'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5038 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-01-16 10:01:17 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) The parentheses are necessary, because without them invariant is a deprecated alias for immutable. Eventually that alternative meaning will go

[Issue 7570] Missing error in ctfe for dereferencing a pointer passed as a parameter

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7570 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|diagnostic | --- Comment #4 from

[Issue 8100] [ICE] with templated subclassing

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8100 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 9327] New: alias this declaration and unknown identifiers lead to segmentation fault

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9327 Summary: alias this declaration and unknown identifiers lead to segmentation fault Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Issue 9195] Should not be able to index a pointer in safed

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9195 --- Comment #8 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-01-16 11:50:29 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 5461] Invalid declaration for auto functions in .di files generated by DMD -H

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5461 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 1427] Generated .di files look ugly and are hard to read

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1427 --- Comment #4 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2013-01-16 14:59:56 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1487 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 9328] New: Use advice from Google PageSpeed Insights

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9328 Summary: Use advice from Google PageSpeed Insights Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Issue 6408] string[].init gives a wrong type

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6408 --- Comment #8 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2013-01-17 11:35:14 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) (In reply to comment #6) I'm not sure T* can be done like this, but it also produces an error instead of being ignored silently.

[Issue 5038] Allow declaring class invariant without parentheses

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5038 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Issue 5038] Allow declaring class invariant without parentheses

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5038 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 5038] Allow declaring class invariant without parentheses

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5038 --- Comment #6 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2013-01-17 11:55:15 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) The deprecation page lists it as deprecated since 2.057, but the Error and Gone dates are empty. I'm not sure what the plan is, but I doubt

[Issue 5529] std.system.endian for pure functions?

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5529 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 5541] Disallow escaping of references to stack-allocated memory

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5541 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Issue 9329] New: unexpected 'int' in error message

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9329 Summary: unexpected 'int' in error message Product: D Version: D1 D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: diagnostic Severity: minor

[Issue 9325] writeln of const class instance

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9325 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 8345] Odd error for using 08 literal

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8345 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 5943] Power expression optimisation: 2^^unsigned == 1unsigned

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5943 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull CC|

[Issue 6033] Better error message with numbers with leading zeros

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6033 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com ---

[Issue 6528] Private module functions optimizations

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6528 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 7034] Infinite foreach on array

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7034 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 5725] ubyte/ushort infinite foreach loops

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5725 --- Comment #2 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2013-01-17 13:54:13 EST --- *** Issue 7034 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 8293] Small amount of static analysis to avoid certain destructor bugs

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8293 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 7840] $ property for arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7840 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 8964] One infinite loop with foreach

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8964 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 5725] ubyte/ushort infinite foreach loops

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5725 --- Comment #3 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2013-01-17 14:02:25 EST --- *** Issue 8964 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 3632] modify float is float to do a bitwise compare

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3632 --- Comment #28 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2013-01-17 16:08:29 EST --- New (and hopefully last) pull https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1499 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Issue 6902] Different pure nothrow int() types

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6902 Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@dawg.eu --- Comment

[Issue 6600] unrelated expression alters function name mangling

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6600 Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6902] Different pure nothrow int() types

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6902 --- Comment #6 from Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu 2013-01-16 21:28:49 PST --- cat bug.d CODE void a() { function void() { }(); } void b() { static void safe_nothrow() @safe nothrow pure { } auto f = safe_nothrow; enum mangle =

[Issue 3796] Result of .stringof is affected by unrelated function declarations

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3796 Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6902] Different pure nothrow int() types

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6902 --- Comment #7 from Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu 2013-01-16 21:39:05 PST --- *** Issue 3796 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving

[Issue 9330] New: Cannot run dmd test suite with MSYS

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9330 Summary: Cannot run dmd test suite with MSYS Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 9330] Cannot run dmd test suite with MSYS

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9330 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1

[Issue 9331] New: incorrect ulong.max value

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9331 Summary: incorrect ulong.max value Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD