https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4268
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2014-03-19 23:01:59
PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Related to Issue 5957?
Only slightly. This shows problems with the return type, while Issue 5957 deals
with template arguments.
--
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7182
Infiltrator lt.infiltra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7009
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2014-03-19 23:58:23
PDT ---
Seeing as how they do not appear to have been replaced yet, should we think
about renaming them to camel case now?
No. We're not doing that anymore. At
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12408
--- Comment #4 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2014-03-20 02:02:14 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I thought that the whole point of using inout was to avoid having to
copy-paste code between mutable, const, and immutable functions?
Yes,
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6980
Infiltrator lt.infiltra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6496
--- Comment #3 from Infiltrator lt.infiltra...@gmail.com 2014-03-19 21:51:43
PDT ---
Good point about this bug report.
Since you know the situation better than I, could you please list here which
changes actually need to be made?
--
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12418
Summary: Add module for C-strings support
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7006
Infiltrator lt.infiltra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5870
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-03-19 21:52:12 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6574
--- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2014-03-20
01:11:38 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
As of v2.065, the provided code compiles and runs without errors. Taking out
the 'Foo!();' line causes a compilation
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7089
Infiltrator lt.infiltra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7009
Infiltrator lt.infiltra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7125
Infiltrator lt.infiltra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6978
Infiltrator lt.infiltra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6961
Infiltrator lt.infiltra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2413
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6496
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2014-03-19 21:45:33
PDT ---
Jonathan, did you end up forgetting about this? :P
Yes, though the bug was created so that we as a community would have a note to
take care of this and
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12404
--- Comment #2 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2014-03-20 01:51:39 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Urgh, fixing this is going to be a breaking change, but not necessarily fix
bugs.
Yeah. I think the best thing to do at this point is to just
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12419
Summary: assertion failure in std.utf
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12420
Summary: [AA] Can't set associative array with array as key
value using key type
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12421
Summary: Allow simpler syntax for lambda template declarations
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12421
--- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2014-03-20
03:24:24 PDT ---
A slightly more fair comparison if we take into account that 'static' acts as
'auto':
-
void main()
{
import std.algorithm;
import
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12413
Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12404
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12422
Summary: Templated nested function is inferred as `pure` even
if it calls impure functions
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12423
Summary: extern(Windows) interfaces with -m64 broken
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7009
--- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-20 03:56:17 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
No. We're not doing that anymore. At this point, we're stuck with whatever
names we have. We've come too far along for breakage based on naming
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12404
--- Comment #4 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2014-03-20 04:20:02 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
Yeah. I think the best thing to do at this point is to just let it be.
Really?
As Peter said, fixing it would
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5665
Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12424
Summary: Cannot do qualifier-overload with mixin template.
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6574
--- Comment #3 from Infiltrator lt.infiltra...@gmail.com 2014-03-20 05:54:44
PDT ---
That's very odd. For me, the infloop only happens with my v2.062 gdc; my
v2.065 dmd and dpaste's v2.065 both give the warning and output of dispatch,
Foo A.
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12387
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
---
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12387
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8074
Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9203
Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||spec
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12425
Summary: allow default values for auto ref
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12425
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12426
Summary: Spurious auto can only be used for template function
parameters for overloaded templated functions
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12423
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #33 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-03-20 12:06:10 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8755
--- Comment #13 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2014-03-20 12:32:49 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
(In reply to comment #10)
How about fold instead, that's the classical functional programming name
for
that. Also there is foldl and
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6741
--- Comment #2 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2014-03-20
12:57:35 PDT ---
It's a bug because when the object is cast implicitly to immutable, it does not
affect the context pointer. In essence, the delegate captures the
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7009
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2014-03-20 16:18:45
PDT ---
We can still introduce countChars and removeChars aliases. And later deprecate
the others.
That would still be renaming them. Maybe we could add new
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8755
--- Comment #14 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-20 18:28:41 PDT ---
Furthermore, it also improves usability by making the seeds passed by
parameter pack, instead of forcing the use of a tuple.
OK. (Despite in a modern language tuples
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8755
--- Comment #15 from wihkman daniel...@bigpond.com 2014-03-20 20:02:07 PDT ---
Why is reduce (sorry, fold) allowing multiple function arguments in the first
place?
If you want to compose functions to avoid another O(n) iteration, then you
45 matches
Mail list logo
