On Tuesday, 23 October 2012 at 16:32:38 UTC,
bearophile_h...@eml.cc wrote:
And to represent those indexes I used a
sbyte instead of a ubyte because I have used -1 to represent
missing value).
You still have to use 0xFF :-). But yes, I understand, that sbyte
and ubyte is better way, how to
On Tuesday, 23 October 2012 at 20:04:08 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 October 2012 at 16:32:38 UTC,
bearophile_h...@eml.cc wrote:
And to represent those indexes I used a
sbyte instead of a ubyte because I have used -1 to represent
missing value).
You still have to use 0xFF
