https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2050
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |D2
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2050
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2050
Rob Jacques changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandf...@jhu.edu
--- Comment #12 from Ro
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2050
--- Comment #11 from and...@metalanguage.com 2009-04-04 10:58 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> This seems to break composability:
>
> interface I1 { final int foo() {return 1;} }
> interface I2 { final int fo
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2050
--- Comment #10 from sandf...@jhu.edu 2009-04-04 10:01 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Consider:
>
> interface Foo
> {
> void bar();
> final void baz() { bar; bar; }
> }
How is this superior to the current interface + mixin a
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2050
--- Comment #9 from sandf...@jhu.edu 2009-04-04 09:53 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
This seems to break composability:
interface I1 { final int foo() {return 1;} }
interface I2 { final int foo() {return 2;} }
class A: I1, I2 {}
Whos
