[Issue 5700] Allow dup in nothrow functions
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5700 --- Comment #9 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commit pushed to 2.067 at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/fa36fa0e8b93b1beb3876e703ba80b3468c1a3f6 Remove workaround for issue 5700 --
[Issue 5700] Allow dup in nothrow functions
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5700 --- Comment #8 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/fa36fa0e8b93b1beb3876e703ba80b3468c1a3f6 Remove workaround for issue 5700 --
[Issue 5700] Allow dup in nothrow functions
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5700 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #7 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- This is working in 2.066 head. --
[Issue 5700] Allow dup in nothrow functions
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5700 Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||verylonglogin@gmail.com Platform|x86 |All OS/Version|Windows |All --- Comment #6 from Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com 2013-10-02 15:34:27 MSD --- Inability to `dup`/`idup` in `nothrow` functions is very frustrating. I'd say this is the most [one of few] PITA of `nothrow` issues for now. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5700] Allow dup in nothrow functions
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5700 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com See Also||http://d.puremagic.com/issu ||es/show_bug.cgi?id=9468 --- Comment #4 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2013-02-07 02:10:00 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) Actually, I think that it depends. For primitives and classes, dup should definitely be allowed. However, for structs, they'd need a postblit which was nothrow (if they had one), and they'd all of their member variables to either be classes or primitives or be structs which... recursion. So, you can't just blindly make the duping of arrays nothrow, but yes, it should generally be legal to dup arrays in nothrow functions. It's just a bit more complicated when dealing with structs. Just want to point out http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9468 : dup does not call postblit. So at this point, *that* issue needs to be fixed before dup can even try to conditionally be nothrow (or @safe) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5700] Allow dup in nothrow functions
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5700 --- Comment #5 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2013-02-07 03:05:13 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #1) Actually, I think that it depends. For primitives and classes, dup should definitely be allowed. However, for structs, they'd need a postblit which was nothrow (if they had one), and they'd all of their member variables to either be classes or primitives or be structs which... recursion. So, you can't just blindly make the duping of arrays nothrow, but yes, it should generally be legal to dup arrays in nothrow functions. It's just a bit more complicated when dealing with structs. Just want to point out http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9468 : dup does not call postblit. So at this point, *that* issue needs to be fixed before dup can even try to conditionally be nothrow (or @safe) Wait, never mind, ignore me. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5700] Allow dup in nothrow functions
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5700 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-03-07 16:21:27 PST --- See also: http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D.learnarticle_id=25400 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5700] Allow dup in nothrow functions
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5700 --- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-03-04 16:11:05 PST --- I see, thank you for your comment. Then dup has to be conditionally nothrow, and we go back to issue 5125. (There is no need for dup to be a template, the conditional nothrow may work on normal functions too, I think). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
