http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7041
--- Comment #7 from Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-03 12:28:28 PST ---
*** Issue 9221 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this m
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7041
Leandro Lucarella changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7041
--- Comment #5 from Leandro Lucarella
2012-04-25 04:58:58 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Please see this pull request:
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/908
>
> It only includes the patch adding the deprecation() functi
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7041
--- Comment #4 from Leandro Lucarella
2012-04-25 04:43:27 PDT ---
Please see this pull request:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/908
It only includes the patch adding the deprecation() function. I think is good
independently
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7041
--- Comment #3 from Leandro Lucarella
2012-02-06 09:51:22 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> More and more switches for is it a warning? is it an error? makes for a rat's
> nest of confusion. I don't find the gcc example of thousands (!) of sw
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7041
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment #
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7041
--- Comment #1 from Leandro Lucarella
2012-02-02 04:07:32 PST ---
> We already have so many options for deprecation and warnings, I am hard
> pressed to agree that adding more will help more than just add complexity.
The problem for me is, th
