subject:"\[Issue 7066\] You can redefine .init and .stringof without error"

[Issue 7066] You can redefine .init and .stringof without error

2022-12-17 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7066 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P4 --

[Issue 7066] You can redefine .init and .stringof without error

2020-03-20 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7066 Basile-z changed: What|Removed |Added CC|b2.t...@gmx.com | --

[Issue 7066] You can redefine .init and .stringof without error

2020-01-08 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7066 Basile-z changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b2.t...@gmx.com --- Comment #13 from Basile-z

[Issue 7066] You can redefine .init and .stringof without error

2020-01-08 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7066 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx --

[Issue 7066] You can redefine .init and .stringof without error

2018-05-14 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7066 Nick Treleaven changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dav...@126.com --- Comment

[Issue 7066] You can redefine .init and .stringof without error

2018-05-14 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7066 Nick Treleaven changed: What|Removed |Added CC||n...@geany.org --- Comment

[Issue 7066] You can redefine .init and .stringof without error

2018-05-14 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7066 Nick Treleaven changed: What|Removed |Added CC||heartcollector...@gmail.com

[Issue 7066] You can redefine .init and .stringof without error

2018-05-14 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7066 Vijay Nayar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mad...@gmail.com --- Comment

[Issue 7066] You can redefine .init and .stringof without error

2015-10-08 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7066 --- Comment #8 from Sobirari Muhomori --- (In reply to timon.gehr from comment #6) > It would be better to have a specific feature here though. E.g. > > struct S{ @disable init; } struct S{ @disable void init(); } ? --

[Issue 7066] You can redefine .init and .stringof without error

2015-10-08 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7066 Sobirari Muhomori changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Issue 7066] You can redefine .init and .stringof without error

2015-10-07 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7066 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan M Davis --- (In reply to timon.gehr from comment #6) > (In reply to Walter Bright from comment #1) > > They're actually supposed to be overridable at the moment. I had thought > > there might

[Issue 7066] You can redefine .init and .stringof without error

2015-10-07 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7066 timon.g...@gmx.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timon.g...@gmx.ch --- Comment #6 from

[Issue 7066] You can redefine .init and .stringof without error

2014-07-29 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7066 davi...@fb.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davi...@fb.com --- Comment #4 from

[Issue 7066] You can redefine .init and .stringof without error

2014-07-29 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7066 --- Comment #5 from davi...@fb.com --- I would like to see this disable or if we don't want to break backwards compatibility for this, we should have the compiler issue a warning. As it stands at the moment, the behavior causes more harm then good.