https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11188
Basile-z changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|b2.t...@gmx.com |
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11188
Simen Kjaeraas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11188
--- Comment #13 from anonymous4 ---
Indeed, but it's still big and shallow mutable. How would you avoid tearing? It
suggests different data layout with increased pressure on GC.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11188
--- Comment #12 from Simen Kjaeraas ---
(In reply to anonymous4 from comment #11)
> I think concurrency support is unreasonable here (and lacks rationale and
> use case). How it would work? Create a mutex for every BigInt?
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11188
--- Comment #11 from anonymous4 ---
I think concurrency support is unreasonable here (and lacks rationale and use
case). How it would work? Create a mutex for every BigInt?
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11188
b2.t...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b2.t...@gmx.com