https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11461
moonlightsenti...@disroot.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11461
naptime changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11461
Richard Cattermole changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11461
--- Comment #14 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2014-03-23 02:32:33
PDT ---
I agree, it seems the better workaround. Clever compilers might notice that the
passed parameter introduces no sideeffects and might infer strong purity,
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11461
Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
---
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11461
--- Comment #16 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-03-23 18:11:42 PDT ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11461
Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11461
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11461
--- Comment #13 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2014-03-22 14:59:11 PDT ---
Maybe the problem can be worked around by making the function(s) *weakly* pure?
(In reply to comment #11)
(In reply to comment #7)
Commit pushed to master at
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11461
--- Comment #3 from Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu 2013-11-15 00:09:19 PST ---
Interesting btw, such a function will either never or always throw an Error.
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11461
monarchdo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com
---
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11461
--- Comment #5 from Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu 2013-11-15 01:35:56 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Interesting btw, such a function will either never or always throw an Error.
The fix is fairly simple, we need a way to annotate noreturn
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11461
--- Comment #6 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-11-15 03:57:30 PST ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11461
--- Comment #7 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-11-15 10:33:56 PST ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11461
Temtaime temta...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||temta...@gmail.com
---
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11461
--- Comment #9 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2013-11-15 11:53:06 PST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Hi, guys.
Maybe i'm too stupid, but how nothrow function can throw ?
D defines both Exception and Error, which derive from Throwable.
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11461
--- Comment #10 from Temtaime temta...@gmail.com 2013-11-15 12:33:55 PST ---
Clear.
Thanks very much for explanation.
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11461
Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@dawg.eu
--- Comment
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11461
--- Comment #2 from Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com 2013-11-15
09:26:02 MSK ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Well, if a function has no side effect and does not produce a result or the
result isn't used, there is no point in
19 matches
Mail list logo