[Issue 12137] [REG DMD2.065-b3] Huge decline in performance
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12137 Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #13 from Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu 2014-02-17 15:01:04 PST --- Fixed with https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/installer/pull/66. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 12137] [REG DMD2.065-b3] Huge decline in performance
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12137 Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@dawg.eu --- Comment #11 from Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu 2014-02-15 23:33:26 PST --- From where do I get the correct snn.lib? -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 12137] [REG DMD2.065-b3] Huge decline in performance
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12137 --- Comment #12 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2014-02-15 23:43:09 PST --- (In reply to comment #11) From where do I get the correct snn.lib? Currently it is in 2.064.zip. http://downloads.dlang.org/releases/2013/dmd.2.064.zip -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 12137] [REG DMD2.065-b3] Huge decline in performance
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12137 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #9 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2014-02-14 20:45:03 PST --- The correct snn.lib is: 08/03/2013 12:20 AM 567,808 snn.lib -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 12137] [REG DMD2.065-b3] Huge decline in performance
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12137 Richard Webb we...@beardmouse.org.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||we...@beardmouse.org.uk --- Comment #8 from Richard Webb we...@beardmouse.org.uk 2014-02-13 03:12:42 PST --- (In reply to comment #7) Is it possible the snn.lib from the 2.064 zip is also the old snn.lib? The snn.lib in 2.064.2 is 555KB and the one in the 2.065.0-b3 zip is 561KB. From what I recall, the smaller one is the one with the malloc fixes. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 12137] [REG DMD2.065-b3] Huge decline in performance
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12137 --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2014-02-12 07:39:04 PST --- (In reply to comment #0) When compiling vibe.d, the performance and memory requirements of DMD got significantly worse (about 7x slower and up to 1.5x more memory requirement). Some measurements in Windows/32: DMD 2.064:5.5 s with about 780 MiB memory used DMD 2.065-b1: 36 s with about 880 MiB memory used DMD 2.065-b3: 40 s with about 880 MiB memory used I'm really not sure what is the problem. In my windows PC, checkout v2.064 tag on dmd/druntime/phobos repositories, then the built environment will cause same issue. But the released 2.064 environment (extracted from zip file) does not cause the issue... -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 12137] [REG DMD2.065-b3] Huge decline in performance
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12137 --- Comment #2 from S�nke Ludwig slud...@outerproduct.org 2014-02-12 07:41:35 PST --- Interesting. Could it be that the last release was built using VisualStudio instead of DMC? Even if that seems to be almost to much of a difference for that to explain it... -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 12137] [REG DMD2.065-b3] Huge decline in performance
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12137 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2014-02-13 03:51:43 EST --- Any chance the failing dmds are being built with the old snn.lib? -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 12137] [REG DMD2.065-b3] Huge decline in performance
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12137 --- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2014-02-12 10:37:20 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) Interesting. Could it be that the last release was built using VisualStudio instead of DMC? Even if that seems to be almost to much of a difference for that to explain it... I'm using dmc for building dmd. So it would be unrelated. (In reply to comment #3) Any chance the failing dmds are being built with the old snn.lib? Unfortunately no. The built dmd.exe from the 2.064 released binaries (dmd2/windows/bin and dmd/windows/lib) causes same issue. Note that, I'm using the latest dmc release: http://ftp.digitalmars.com/Digital_Mars_C++/Patch/dm857c.zip -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 12137] [REG DMD2.065-b3] Huge decline in performance
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12137 --- Comment #5 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2014-02-13 05:57:52 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #3) Any chance the failing dmds are being built with the old snn.lib? Unfortunately no. The built dmd.exe from the 2.064 released binaries (dmd2/windows/bin and dmd/windows/lib) causes same issue. Note that, I'm using the latest dmc release: http://ftp.digitalmars.com/Digital_Mars_C++/Patch/dm857c.zip But really, what else could it be? If you're compiling the same 2.064 code and getting a slower compiler out, what else could do that? I assume you were using 2.064 druntime/phobos to test the 2.064 compiler. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 12137] [REG DMD2.065-b3] Huge decline in performance
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12137 --- Comment #6 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2014-02-12 17:19:50 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #3) Any chance the failing dmds are being built with the old snn.lib? Unfortunately no. The built dmd.exe from the 2.064 released binaries (dmd2/windows/bin and dmd/windows/lib) causes same issue. Note that, I'm using the latest dmc release: http://ftp.digitalmars.com/Digital_Mars_C++/Patch/dm857c.zip But really, what else could it be? If you're compiling the same 2.064 code and getting a slower compiler out, what else could do that? snn.lib is in dmd/windows/lib, and even if I replace the directory with the one in the released 2.064, slow compiler will be built. So I really not sure what is wrong... I assume you were using 2.064 druntime/phobos to test the 2.064 compiler. Yes. I checkout v2.064 tag in dmd/druntime/phobos repositories, then build them with the built (== slow) 2.064 dmd.exe. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 12137] [REG DMD2.065-b3] Huge decline in performance
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12137 --- Comment #7 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2014-02-13 13:52:47 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) snn.lib is in dmd/windows/lib, and even if I replace the directory with the one in the released 2.064, slow compiler will be built. So I really not sure what is wrong... Is it possible the snn.lib from the 2.064 zip is also the old snn.lib? I have CD81574FAA1B6876E053A5C3A16C8DFBF6D69100 in my dmc dir and D65F7172F521940828C08EB9F5D09214490DBFAB in my dmd2\windows\bin dir. I'm sure one of these is the wrong one, but they both came from recent zips (about a month ago) -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
