[Issue 12558] try/catch allows implicit catching of Throwables without specifying any Exception type

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12558 briancsch...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||briancsch...@gmail.com

[Issue 12558] try/catch allows implicit catching of Throwables without specifying any Exception type

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12558 Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 12558] try/catch allows implicit catching of Throwables without specifying any Exception type

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12558 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull

[Issue 12558] try/catch allows implicit catching of Throwables without specifying any Exception type

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12558 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com --- Comment

[Issue 12558] try/catch allows implicit catching of Throwables without specifying any Exception type

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12558 --- Comment #6 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- (In reply to monarchdodra from comment #5) Besides, how hard is it to just write: catch(Throwbale) The general rule is: When there's a way to abuse the system, it /will/ be abused.

[Issue 12558] try/catch allows implicit catching of Throwables without specifying any Exception type

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12558 Nick Treleaven ntrel-pub...@yahoo.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 12558] try/catch allows implicit catching of Throwables without specifying any Exception type

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12558 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment

[Issue 12558] try/catch allows implicit catching of Throwables without specifying any Exception type

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12558 --- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- (In reply to yebblies from comment #2) I dunno, catching asserts like that is useful. Why shouldn't the default be to catch absolutely everything? Because you're potentially

[Issue 12558] try/catch allows implicit catching of Throwables without specifying any Exception type

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12558 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|try/catch allows implicit |try/catch allows

[Issue 12558] try/catch allows implicit catching of Throwables without specifying any Exception type

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12558 --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Andrej Mitrovic from comment #0) $ dmd -run test.d Caught a Throwable Technically it caught an Error (AssertError), but anywho.. --