[Issue 15656] broken link in datetime.d documentation

[via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15656

Gerald Jansen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INVALID

--- Comment #2 from Gerald Jansen  ---
(In reply to ag0aep6g from comment #1)
> I suppose this is about the ddox pages [1], right? 

Yes. Okay so this is a ddox issue and presumably it is well known so I'll close
this issue.

--

[Issue 15656] broken link in datetime.d documentation

[via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15656

ag0ae...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ag0ae...@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from ag0ae...@gmail.com ---
I suppose this is about the ddox pages [1], right? The link is broken there,
but it's fine on the ddoc pages [2].

The underscore is there for a reason: Without it, "datetime" would be
highlighted by ddoc, which would garble the URL, breaking the link.

That ddox carries over the underscore literally seems to be a bug, or at least
an incompatibility between ddox and ddoc.

So, fixing this will be more complicated than just removing the underscore,
unfortunately.


[1] ,

[2] ,


--

[Issue 15656] broken link in datetime.d documentation

[via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15656

ag0ae...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|INVALID |---

--- Comment #3 from ag0ae...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Gerald Jansen from comment #2)
> Yes. Okay so this is a ddox issue and presumably it is well known so I'll
> close this issue.

I don't think it's well known. At least, this is the first time it's been
pointed out to me. This may have to be fixed in ddox, but the broken links are
an issue for phobos/dlang.org. So this is definitely not invalid. Reopening.

--