[Issue 16431] rdmd is slower than DUB

2016-08-26 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16431 --- Comment #3 from ag0ae...@gmail.com --- (In reply to greensunny12 from comment #2) > Well, it still seems unnecessary to me to run the full-blown CTFE compiler > twice on a file. Sure. If you make rdmd faster, that's great. I just don't think

[Issue 16431] rdmd is slower than DUB

2016-08-25 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16431 --- Comment #2 from greensunn...@gmail.com --- > I don't think this is much of a surprise. rdmd detects dependencies. dub > doesn't seem to do that. Well, it still seems unnecessary to me to run the full-blown CTFE compiler twice on a file. I gave

[Issue 16431] rdmd is slower than DUB

2016-08-25 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16431 ag0ae...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ag0ae...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from