[Issue 17352] [REG 2.075a] Internal error: ddmd/backend/elfobj.c 1739 on duplicate definition

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17352 Basile-z changed: What|Removed |Added CC|b2.t...@gmx.com | --

[Issue 17352] [REG 2.075a] Internal error: ddmd/backend/elfobj.c 1739 on duplicate definition

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17352 --- Comment #9 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to newCTFE at https://github.com/dlang/dmd https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/76affab78fec0c9acb0253d9672c5c0bdf843dd4 fix Issue 17352 - Internal error: ddmd/backend/elfobj.c 1739

[Issue 17352] [REG 2.075a] Internal error: ddmd/backend/elfobj.c 1739 on duplicate definition

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17352 --- Comment #8 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dmd https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/76affab78fec0c9acb0253d9672c5c0bdf843dd4 fix Issue 17352 - Internal error: ddmd/backend/elfobj.c 1739

[Issue 17352] [REG 2.075a] Internal error: ddmd/backend/elfobj.c 1739 on duplicate definition

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17352 --- Comment #7 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to stable at https://github.com/dlang/dmd https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/76affab78fec0c9acb0253d9672c5c0bdf843dd4 fix Issue 17352 - Internal error: ddmd/backend/elfobj.c 1739

[Issue 17352] [REG 2.075a] Internal error: ddmd/backend/elfobj.c 1739 on duplicate definition

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17352 github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 17352] [REG 2.075a] Internal error: ddmd/backend/elfobj.c 1739 on duplicate definition

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17352 --- Comment #6 from Martin Nowak --- cat > bug.d << CODE void bug(Args...)() { } void test(bool coin) { if (coin) { string foobar; bug!foobar(); } else { string foobar; bug!foobar();

[Issue 17352] [REG 2.075a] Internal error: ddmd/backend/elfobj.c 1739 on duplicate definition

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17352 --- Comment #5 from Martin Nowak --- (In reply to Ketmar Dark from comment #4) > i mean, yes, the frontend should check for conflicting overloads even if > they weren't called anywhere. Could be easily checked in overloadInsert et.al.

[Issue 17352] [REG 2.075a] Internal error: ddmd/backend/elfobj.c 1739 on duplicate definition

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17352 --- Comment #4 from Ketmar Dark --- yeah. but the frontend will check for conflicting overloads only when `foo()` will be called. i guess this was done to gain some compilation speed by not checking each symbol against other

[Issue 17352] [REG 2.075a] Internal error: ddmd/backend/elfobj.c 1739 on duplicate definition

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17352 Martin Nowak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@dawg.eu --- Comment #3

[Issue 17352] [REG 2.075a] Internal error: ddmd/backend/elfobj.c 1739 on duplicate definition

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17352 b2.t...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b2.t...@gmx.com