[Issue 17408] scope and in are considered redundant

2022-12-17 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17408 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P3 --

[Issue 17408] scope and in are considered redundant

2022-11-18 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17408 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added CC||razvan.nitu1...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from

[Issue 17408] scope and in are considered redundant

2019-07-13 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
created dlang/dmd pull request #10168 " Fix issue 17408: scope and in are considered redundant" fixing this issue: - Fix issue 17408: scope and in are considered redundant https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/10168 --

[Issue 17408] scope and in are considered redundant

2017-05-19 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17408 --- Comment #1 from anonymous4 --- Maybe only @safe code should treat in as const? I think @system code should still treat it as const scope. --