[Issue 2474] Recursive lazy arguments are inlined incorrectly

2019-09-13 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2474 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Issue 2474] Recursive lazy arguments are inlined incorrectly

2019-09-13 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2474 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added CC||razvan.nitu1...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Razva

[Issue 2474] Recursive lazy arguments are inlined incorrectly

2010-09-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2474 Don changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fa...@gmx.ch --- Comment #4 from Don 2010-09-13

[Issue 2474] Recursive lazy arguments are inlined incorrectly

2009-01-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2474 s...@iname.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Com

[Issue 2474] Recursive lazy arguments are inlined incorrectly

2008-11-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2474 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-27 10:51 --- > I'm not sure if the compiler is actually within its rights to complain about > this, as it's bad code even though not technically illegal... > > > Without the -inline flag

[Issue 2474] Recursive lazy arguments are inlined incorrectly

2008-11-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2474 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Version