https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2596
--- Comment #11 from Dlang Bot ---
dlang/dlang.org pull request #3602 "Updates to Template Comparison page" was
merged into master:
- 00028f506c024b3b08c9bd2e6fdcfa000fb0 by tjs137:
Constructor templates are supported since 2.027
See
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2596
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |D2
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2596
bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2596
--- Comment #7 from jarrett.billings...@gmail.com 2009-03-16 19:48 ---
Walter didn't say it is impossible, he merely pointed out that the case is not
a variadic constructor, but a /variadic template/ constructor, I believe.
I
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2596
--- Comment #2 from and...@metalanguage.com 2009-01-21 09:13 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
S s = S();
What should be called - a default ctor or S.this() with empty tuple?
Good question. Today that must be the default ctor
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2596
--- Comment #1 from 2kor...@gmail.com 2009-01-21 01:19 ---
S s = S();
What should be called - a default ctor or S.this() with empty tuple?
--