https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3258
RazvanN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3258
--- Comment #12 from Diggory diggory.ha...@gmail.com 2012-12-22 02:26:22 PST
---
(In reply to comment #11)
(In reply to comment #10)
I forgot one thing that completes the circle, and that is friend
declarations.
There are no friend
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3258
--- Comment #13 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2012-12-22 03:56:58 PST ---
(In reply to comment #12)
For the problem at hand though, without causing a lot of breakage,
that means either private/package become virtual by default,
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3258
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3258
--- Comment #7 from Diggory diggory.ha...@gmail.com 2012-12-21 11:19:38 PST
---
Andrej, that seems like a funny change to me. Unless D2 either allows virtual
package functions or states that these are not allowed it seems that it's still
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3258
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3258
--- Comment #9 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-12-21
15:09:12 PST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Yeah I know, the spec tells one thing on one page, then another thing on
another. It says Package extends private on the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3258
--- Comment #10 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-12-21
17:04:28 PST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Non-virtual by default + a virtual keyword + no limits on virtuality based on
access specifiers = dream come true (for me).
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3258
--- Comment #11 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2012-12-21 17:14:10 PST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
I forgot one thing that completes the circle, and that is friend declarations.
There are no friend declarations in D. So what exactly
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3258
Mike Shulman viritrilbi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3258
--- Comment #3 from Diggory diggory.ha...@gmail.com 2009-08-19 23:14:26 PDT
---
With private functions, yes. But I've never heard that package functions can't
be virtual. Stewart Gordan, are you saying package functions aren't virtual by
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3258
Jarrett Billingsley jarrett.billings...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3258
Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@iname.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3258
Matti Niemenmaa matti.niemenmaa+dbugzi...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
14 matches
Mail list logo
