[Issue 3713] Tail call optimization not enabled with the ?: operator

2020-09-13 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Dlang Bot --- dlang/dmd pull request #11725 "fix Issue 3713 - Tail call optimization not enabled with the ?: operator" was merged into master: - fc88c8befa53870256fbe8f2abbba3c397469323 by Walter Bright: fix Issue 3713 - Tail call optimization not en

[Issue 3713] Tail call optimization not enabled with the ?: operator

2020-09-13 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||performance --

[Issue 3713] Tail call optimization not enabled with the ?: operator

2020-09-13 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 --- Comment #4 from Dlang Bot --- @WalterBright created dlang/dmd pull request #11725 "fix Issue 3713 - Tail call optimization not enabled with the ?: operator" fixing this issue: - fix Issue 3713 - Tail call optimization not enable

[Issue 3713] Tail call optimization not enabled with the ?: operator

2020-08-28 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||backend CC|

[Issue 3713] Tail call optimization not enabled with the ?: operator

2015-06-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added Version|D1 & D2 |D2 --

[Issue 3713] Tail call optimization not enabled with the ?: operator

2014-08-31 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|yebbl...@gmail.com |nob...@puremagic.com --

[Issue 3713] Tail call optimization not enabled with the ?: operator

2013-10-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 safety0ff.bugz changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #1257|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Issue 3713] Tail call optimization not enabled with the ?: operator

2013-10-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 --- Comment #2 from safety0ff.bugz 2013-10-04 20:01:14 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1257) Partial solution I took a stab at this one. I've gotten b2search to compile to the same assembly code as b3search. I did not handle nested ternary

[Issue 3713] Tail call optimization not enabled with the ?: operator

2012-02-20 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|performance |pull, wrong-code AssignedTo|nob...@p