[Issue 3796] Result of .stringof is affected by unrelated function declarations

2013-02-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3796 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3796] Result of .stringof is affected by unrelated function declarations

2013-01-16 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3796 Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3796] Result of .stringof is affected by unrelated function declarations

2010-02-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3796 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3796] Result of .stringof is affected by unrelated function declarations

2010-02-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3796 --- Comment #2 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2010-02-13 00:36:21 PST --- The problem could be fixed by having .stringof demangle the deco, rather than pretty-printing the type it came from. Unfortunately, there isn't a demangler

[Issue 3796] Result of .stringof is affected by unrelated function declarations

2010-02-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3796 --- Comment #4 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2010-02-13 14:47:25 PST --- Yes, I think it's pretty clear going the demangler route is better. I agree there should be some other means to get the parameter identifiers. --