[Issue 4287] opOpAssign!(~=) for std.array.Appender

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4287 Alex R�nne Petersen a...@lycus.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 4287] opOpAssign!(~=) for std.array.Appender

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4287 --- Comment #8 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-02-07 16:38:57 PST --- It seems the length attribute (and opIndex()) didn't get in this patch. I don't know if they are worth another ER. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 4287] opOpAssign!(~=) for std.array.Appender

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4287 --- Comment #9 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-02-07 16:47:07 PST --- (In reply to comment #8) It seems the length attribute (and opIndex()) didn't get in this patch. I don't know if they are worth another ER. I seemd

[Issue 4287] opOpAssign!(~=) for std.array.Appender

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4287 --- Comment #10 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-02-07 18:14:58 PST --- (In reply to comment #9) I seemd to have skipped this part of the request. But you can open a new request for this. OK. The length attribute is useful, to know at what

[Issue 4287] opOpAssign!(~=) for std.array.Appender

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4287 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 4287] opOpAssign!(~=) for std.array.Appender

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4287 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull

[Issue 4287] opOpAssign!(~=) for std.array.Appender

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4287 --- Comment #7 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-02-03 16:03:05 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) Why was opOpAssign in that pull implemented with returning the 'this' reference? I saw this in TDPL too, but I don't see the benefit of having

[Issue 4287] opOpAssign!(~=) for std.array.Appender

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4287 Rob Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandf...@jhu.edu ---

[Issue 4287] opOpAssign!(~=) for std.array.Appender

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4287 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-03-12 05:37:11 PDT --- See a discussion thread here, where I have suggested to give Appenhder both put method and a ~= operator:

[Issue 4287] opOpAssign!(~=) for std.array.Appender

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4287 Rob Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alvaro.seg...@gmail.com

[Issue 4287] opOpAssign!(~=) for std.array.Appender

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4287 --- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-01-28 14:38:22 PST --- The put() method is not easy to remember (other collections use insert(), etc), so for me the ~= is simpler to remember. The needed code for Appender, tested a little: