[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481 --- Comment #42 from Andrei Alexandrescu --- (In reply to RazvanN from comment #41) > should this be closed? Let's keep it open until a library implementation is merged. I'll change the title. --

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added CC||razvan.nitu1...@gmail.com

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481 --- Comment #39 from Ketmar Dark --- tbh, i don't really care, as i've integrated this patch into my private dmd build long time ago and i'm happy with it. so i have no opinion here (yes, i know that "my D" is incompatible

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481 --- Comment #38 from Shriramana Sharma --- Hmmm. I read through the thread starting at http://forum.dlang.org/post/mag5hp$105a$1...@digitalmars.com. I think I sorta see the point of the developers here. While I still think [$] is

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481 rswhi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rswhi...@gmail.com --- Comment #40 from

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481 --- Comment #37 from Ketmar Dark --- you are welcome to search NG for heated discussions. this issue is setteld down, so there's no reason to argue anymore. alas. --

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481 --- Comment #36 from Shriramana Sharma --- (In reply to Ketmar Dark from comment #35) > sorry, i messed dates. :-) > > the `[$]` patch was first merged, and then reverted. this feature will not > be in D2, ever: it was decided that

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481 --- Comment #32 from Shriramana Sharma --- (In reply to hsteoh from comment #30) > Huh, I thought this PR was reverted because Andrei/Walter didn't like it; > why is it being pulled into the 2.067 branch? What is not to like about

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481 --- Comment #33 from Ketmar Dark --- don't worry, the patch was quickly reversed. it's simply bugzilla cannot automaticaly track reverts. --

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481 --- Comment #34 from Shriramana Sharma --- (In reply to Ketmar Dark from comment #33) > don't worry, the patch was quickly reversed. it's simply bugzilla cannot > automaticaly track reverts. Sorry if I'm being dense – it's not

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481 --- Comment #35 from Ketmar Dark --- sorry, i messed dates. :-) the `[$]` patch was first merged, and then reverted. this feature will not be in D2, ever: it was decided that one can do almost the same thing with some

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481 naptime naptimeentertainm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481 Brad Anderson e...@gnuk.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||e...@gnuk.net --- Comment #31

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481 --- Comment #30 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx --- Huh, I thought this PR was reverted because Andrei/Walter didn't like it; why is it being pulled into the 2.067 branch? --

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/fa296e9f088e0e3ccc9f339423bbef15cb3840aa Merge pull request #3615 from 9rnsr/fix481 --

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

- Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/commit/fae6a0500bebcd10e2dc266047693ec075e0cbb1 Merge pull request #893 from D-Programming-Language/revert-590-fix481 Revert Issue 481 - Letting compiler determine length for fixed

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

Issue 481 - Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays --

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481 Ketmar Dark ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481 --- Comment #23 from Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com --- Whoa! 8 years later! yay! --

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481 Martin Krejcirik m...@krej.cz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@krej.cz --- Comment #24

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

- Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/commit/90f4144d0e93d4bf83941f174210eae45a9e498c Merge pull request #590 from 9rnsr/fix481 Issue 481 - Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays --

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481 --- Comment #21 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- See Issue 14066 --

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/fa296e9f088e0e3ccc9f339423bbef15cb3840aa Merge pull request #3615 from 9rnsr/fix481 Issue 481 - Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays --

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481 github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481 --- Comment #19 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com --- Spec change: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/590 --

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull Version|D1

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=481 rswhi...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rswhi...@googlemail.com ---

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=481 Shriramana Sharma samj...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||samj...@gmail.com

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=481 thelastmamm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thelastmamm...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=481 SomeDude lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=481 --- Comment #11 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-04-30 17:04:35 PDT --- (In reply to comment #10) Sorry to be blunt here but this whole discussion is absolutely pointless and should be closed as WONTFIX right now. People have better things to

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=481 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx ---

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=481 --- Comment #13 from thelastmamm...@gmail.com 2012-04-30 17:38:59 PDT --- (In reply to comment #11 and comment #12) I agree with the need for some syntactic sugar for static array literal, but is there any scenario where the postfix literal

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=481 --- Comment #7 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-01-19 02:15:21 PST --- This is a very low priority issue. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=481 --- Comment #8 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-01-19 04:46:56 PST --- (In reply to comment #7) This is a very low priority issue. Well, I don't agree. It's a language design issue, so its priority is higher than most implementation matters.

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=481 --- Comment #5 from Bruno Medeiros bdom.pub+deeb...@gmail.com 2010-12-14 04:27:54 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #3) I don't quite get this argument. Originally array literals used to create fixed length arrays:

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=481 --- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-12-14 13:24:26 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) But then we're not looking for a syntax that would also allows us to use auto (as in auto a = [1,2,3,4];), is that what we're saying? Now I think

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=481 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=481 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---