[Issue 4977] cannot use nothrow or pure with Rebindable

2015-06-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4977 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |D2 --

[Issue 4977] cannot use nothrow or pure with Rebindable

2011-09-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4977 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 4977] cannot use nothrow or pure with Rebindable

2011-08-23 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4977 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #4

[Issue 4977] cannot use nothrow or pure with Rebindable

2010-10-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4977 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2010-10-02 18:39:56 PDT --- Here's a first attempt at a solution: Rebindable(T) if (is(T == class) || is(T == interface) || isArray!(T)) { static if (!is(T X == const(U), U) !is(T

[Issue 4977] cannot use nothrow or pure with Rebindable

2010-10-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4977 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2010-10-02 19:53:51 PDT --- With the fix for bug # 3318, the new get property function now joins opDot() in needing a const version with both versions being nothrow. -- Configure