[Issue 5006] 'pure' unenforced in a nested function

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5006 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 5006] 'pure' unenforced in a nested function

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5006 --- Comment #6 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-02-21 11:50:21 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) > > On the other hand, bearophile's 2nd program now result in ICE (at least on Mac > OS X) > > Internal error: ../ztc/machobj.c 1805 Never mind, it ICE

[Issue 5006] 'pure' unenforced in a nested function

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5006 kenn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kenn...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 fr

[Issue 5006] 'pure' unenforced in a nested function

2010-10-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5006 Lewis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lewis1...@gmail.com OS/Version|Windows

[Issue 5006] 'pure' unenforced in a nested function

2010-10-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5006 Don changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au --- Comment #3 from Don 2

[Issue 5006] 'pure' unenforced in a nested function

2010-10-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5006 --- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-10-26 15:34:16 PDT --- It seems currently (2.050alpha) nested functions can't be pure: import std.traits: FunctionAttribute, functionAttributes; void main() { static pure int foo1(int x) { re

Re: [Issue 5006] 'pure' unenforced in a nested function

2010-10-07 Thread Don
d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5006 Stewart Gordon changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accept

[Issue 5006] 'pure' unenforced in a nested function

2010-10-07 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5006 Stewart Gordon changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid CC|