http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6277
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6277
--- Comment #20 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-07-23 13:50:30
PDT ---
RESOLVED LATER? I didn't even realize that that was an option. I take it that
that means that it's something that we'd like to do with a major revision like
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6277
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6277
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-07-22 14:36:54
PDT ---
While I appreciate the rationale here, we need to stop breaking existing code.
This is highly annoying and disruptive to existing projects, and I think
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6277
--- Comment #13 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-07-22
15:05:44 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
To be fair, adding UFCS broke code using floating point literals, since 1.f
became illegal.
I agree that we do break things
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6277
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-07-22 15:15:46
PDT ---
I think that the irritation caused by this should would be minimal (well
disallowing 1. anyway - .1 would get _far_ more complaints), and I'd _like_ to
see
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6277
--- Comment #16 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-07-22 15:47:23 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #13)
After all, it's been around in C
forever without making anyone's list I've seen on things I hate about C.
C doesn't have UCFS. And it's on my
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6277
--- Comment #15 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-07-22 15:45:43 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
If we're not going to make the change though, I think that we should close
this
enhancement request.
There are also 8 votes on this
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6277
--- Comment #17 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-07-22
15:50:43 PDT ---
I think that the irritation caused by this should would be minimal
Certainly it's easy for the user to fix the code.
The *problem*, though, is:
I
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6277
--- Comment #18 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-07-22 16:04:37 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #17)
Certainly it's easy for the user to fix the code.
The *problem*, though, is:
I downloaded this D library and it won't compile! D sux!
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6277
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6277
--- Comment #6 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-21 03:17:30 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6277
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-07-21 03:26:53
PDT ---
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1061
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6277
--- Comment #8 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-07-21 05:40:07 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1061
Thank you Jonathan.
Pull 1061 implements half of this request: it disallow 5. and it
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6277
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-07-21 12:02:54
PDT ---
Pull 1061 implements half of this request: it disallow 5. and it doesn't
disallow .5
Given the fact that when writing by hand, .5 wouldn't have a 0 on it
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6277
--- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-07-11 09:55:45 PDT ---
Steven Schveighoffer reminds this is probably OK (this compiles with DMD
2.054):
void main() {
auto x = 1f;
static assert(is(typeof(x) == float));
}
--
Configure
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6277
--- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-07-10 13:17:38 PDT ---
The proposal is for hex floating point literals too.
Daniel Murphy suggests to disallow 1._3 too, to help UFCS (Numeric literals
cannot *start* with an underscore already).
17 matches
Mail list logo
