[Issue 7438] Functions from std.conv should be pure

2022-08-31 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7438 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 7438] Functions from std.conv should be pure

2019-12-07 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7438 berni44 changed: What|Removed |Added CC||qs.il.paperi...@gmail.com --- Comment #9 from

[Issue 7438] Functions from std.conv should be pure

2016-10-15 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7438 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||bootcamp

[Issue 7438] Functions from std.conv should be pure

2014-09-19 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7438 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx --

[Issue 7438] Functions from std.conv should be pure

2014-09-19 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7438 Orvid King blah38...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||blah38...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 7438] Functions from std.conv should be pure

2013-08-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7438 --- Comment #7 from Robert Schadek rburn...@gmail.com 2013-08-14 00:35:16 PDT --- yes it turtles down. Just to see how hard it breaks I mark some pure. I stopped somewhere in format. So looks like not so much fun. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 7438] Functions from std.conv should be pure

2013-08-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7438 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2013-08-13 19:47:19 PDT --- Whether std.conv.to can be @safe or pure depends entirely on what you're converting. For all of the built-in types, it should be @safe and pure, but once

[Issue 7438] Functions from std.conv should be pure

2013-08-12 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7438 Robert Schadek rburn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rburn...@gmail.com

[Issue 7438] Functions from std.conv should be pure

2012-04-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7438 SomeDude lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 7438] Functions from std.conv should be pure

2012-04-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7438 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---

[Issue 7438] Functions from std.conv should be pure

2012-04-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7438 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-04-19 15:11:15 PDT --- I'd be very tempted to argue that that should be a separate bug. There's a big difference between std.conv.to should always be pure for everything and