http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7818
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7818
--- Comment #6 from Manu 2012-04-21 10:12:19 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> This compiles and runs fine under 2.059 Win32
Yes, that conclusion was already made in the prev posts.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/user
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7818
SomeDude changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com
--- Comment #5 f
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7818
--- Comment #4 from Manu 2012-04-05 10:05:00 PDT ---
Are there ETA's for releases? A release schedule perhaps?
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7818
--- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara 2012-04-04 01:18:07 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> "DMD32 D Compiler v2.058"
> ...only one version difference. It would seem so.
I think this issue is much similar with bug 7160, but it was already fixed in
2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7818
--- Comment #2 from Manu 2012-04-04 00:35:41 PDT ---
"DMD32 D Compiler v2.058"
...only one version difference. It would seem so.
There's no binaries for 059 yet. How often do they usually get built?
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7818
--- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2012-04-03 17:51:49 PDT ---
In 2.059head (c2824d43e470d), the code compiles without any assertions.
What version do you use? (It seems to me that is an issue recently fixed.)
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.pur
