[Issue 8487] Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow

2019-10-10 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8487 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 8487] Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow

2014-08-18 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8487 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan M Davis --- std.metastrings is no longer with us, but I'd be very surprised if the problem with template performance were fixed. Clearly, a new example is needed though ,since std.metastrings has finally been removed. --

[Issue 8487] Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow

2014-08-18 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8487 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx --- Comment #9

[Issue 8487] Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow

2012-08-01 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8487 Jacob Carlborg changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@me.com --- Comment #8 from Jacob

[Issue 8487] Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow

2012-08-01 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8487 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #

[Issue 8487] Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8487 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan M Davis 2012-07-31 22:13:26 PDT --- Thanks for your solution, though I did figure one out just a little bit ago. Regardless, I think that the original solution should compile in a reasonably short period of time (

[Issue 8487] Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8487 --- Comment #5 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-07-31 21:42:23 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > Well, the performance can probably be improved, but I'd advise rewriting > > that > snippet to use CTFE instead. > > I'm trying to figure out how to

[Issue 8487] Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8487 --- Comment #4 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-07-31 21:39:19 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1131) Shorter and simpler module with named entities which takes 0.2+ seconds to compile -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userpref

[Issue 8487] Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8487 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis 2012-07-31 20:45:16 PDT --- > Well, the performance can probably be improved, but I'd advise rewriting that snippet to use CTFE instead. I'm trying to figure out how to do that, and I'll probably manage it

[Issue 8487] Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8487 timon.g...@gmx.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timon.g...@gmx.ch --- Comment #2 fr

[Issue 8487] Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8487 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis 2012-07-31 20:00:40 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1130) The results of profiling dmd with googleperftools when compiling the previously attached file Here's the full results from googleperftools. --