[Issue 8775] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: Range Violation

2012-11-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8775 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 8775] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: Range Violation

2012-10-07 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8775 Alex R�nne Petersen a...@lycus.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@lycus.org

[Issue 8775] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: Range Violation

2012-10-07 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8775 --- Comment #2 from Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk 2012-10-07 05:01:13 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1149) output_d.d -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

[Issue 8775] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: Range Violation

2012-10-07 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8775 Alex R�nne Petersen a...@lycus.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|druntime|DMD --- Comment

[Issue 8775] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: Range Violation

2012-10-07 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8775 --- Comment #4 from Alex Rønne Petersen a...@lycus.org 2012-10-07 15:02:30 CEST --- FWIW, changing the foreach loop to a for loop makes the code run (presumably correctly; I didn't actually look at what it's supposed to do).

[Issue 8775] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: Range Violation

2012-10-07 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8775 --- Comment #5 from Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk 2012-10-07 07:37:56 PDT --- Perhaps worth noting that this code compiles and runs fine using ldc2 compiled from the Git repository. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 8775] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: Range Violation

2012-10-07 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8775 --- Comment #6 from Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk 2012-10-07 07:40:51 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) FWIW, changing the foreach loop to a for loop makes the code run (presumably correctly; I didn't actually look at what it's supposed