[Issue 8928] Poor error message for derived class without constructor
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8928 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|D1 D2 |D2 --
[Issue 8928] Poor error message for derived class without constructor
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8928] Poor error message for derived class without constructor
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928 --- Comment #7 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-12-09 09:59:51 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/6a4840212b1ee0611c9c8fecc59ec8500e8999ea Fixes Issue 8928 - Improve error message with implicitly generated constructor. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/4cc63a038e27356d5d60a93e57b794b37167cab0 Merge pull request #1336 from AndrejMitrovic/Fix8928 [diag] Issue 8928 - Improve error message with implicitly generated constructor -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8928] Poor error message for derived class without constructor
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull AssignedTo|nob...@puremagic.com|andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-29 14:42:53 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1336 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8928] Poor error message for derived class without constructor
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-11-01 23:13:41 PDT --- Well, it really doesn't match the definition of synthesized at all, so I have to wonder about whoever picked it for C++. Regardless, using it in an error message like that isn't going to be clear to most programmers. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8928] Poor error message for derived class without constructor
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-01 22:26:45 PDT --- How about: Error: synthesized constructor qef.Y.this no match for implicit super() call in constructor -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8928] Poor error message for derived class without constructor
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com --- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-11-01 22:42:08 PDT --- Synthesized? That's a very odd choice of words, and actually, I'd argue that it's outright incorrect. How about something more like Error: Cannot generate default constructor for qef.Y, because its base class, qef.X, has no default constructor. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8928] Poor error message for derived class without constructor
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928 --- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-01 22:48:02 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) Synthesized? That's a very odd choice of words, and actually, I'd argue that it's outright incorrect. It's standard terminology, you can look up the C++ reference manual if you wish. Here's a sample g++ error when the compiler implicitly generates a method: /usr/include/c++/4.4/iosfwd:56: note: synthesized method ‘std::basic_ios std::basic_ios ::operator=(const std::basic_ios )’ first required here -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8928] Poor error message for derived class without constructor
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928 --- Comment #4 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-01 22:48:53 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) Synthesized? That's a very odd choice of words, and actually, I'd argue that it's outright incorrect. It's standard terminology But I'm not saying it's the best choice of words. So suggestions are welcome. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
