Re: [Issue 1977] integral arithmetic operation only on int?

2008-11-26 Thread Don
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1977 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Issue 1924] Allow pragma(msg) in CTFE

2008-11-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1924 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Keywords|spec

Re: [Issue 1977] integral arithmetic operation only on int?

2008-11-26 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu
Don wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1977 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Issue 1924] Allow pragma(msg) in CTFE

2008-11-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1924 --- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-26 11:17 --- To date, every use of writefln I've seen has been run time. So it doesn't seem particularly ambiguous at least to me, --

[Issue 1924] Allow pragma(msg) in CTFE

2008-11-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1924 --- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-26 12:05 --- (In reply to comment #7) To date, every use of writefln I've seen has been run time. So it doesn't seem particularly ambiguous at least to me, That's because at the moment

[Issue 1924] Allow pragma(msg) in CTFE

2008-11-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1924 --- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-26 12:43 --- Sorry, I was far less than clear. writefln in all cases we use it in now executes with the code path, e.g. when the code is executed rather than generated. pragma is

Re: [Issue 1977] integral arithmetic operation only on int?

2008-11-26 Thread Jarrett Billingsley
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Stewart Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has the automatic relaying of newsgroup posts to Bugzilla been discontinued, or does it only work if the email address it's sent from is registered? It was probably the right thing to do considering the excessive quoting

[Issue 2474] New: Recursive lazy arguments are inlined incorrectly

2008-11-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2474 Summary: Recursive lazy arguments are inlined incorrectly Product: D Version: 2.021 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: