[Issue 2493] New: link error trying to compile simple program

2008-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2493 Summary: link error trying to compile simple program Product: D Version: 2.021 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 2493] link error trying to compile simple program

2008-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2493 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-06 13:03 --- Created an attachment (id=280) -- (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=280action=view) program that fails to link --

[Issue 2476] std.stdio fails to compile

2008-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2476 --- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-06 13:05 --- (In reply to comment #5) runtime worked when I tried i on Windows. If it doesn't work, then that's a bug. What errors do you get? I get the same error as with the

[Issue 2116] Very incomplete docs for std.c.process

2008-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2116 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Very incomplete docs|Very incomplete docs for

[Issue 2494] New: describe explicit casting of arrays

2008-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2494 Summary: describe explicit casting of arrays Product: D Version: 2.021 Platform: PC URL: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/arrays.html OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW

[Issue 2495] New: const syntax for member functions needs better description

2008-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2495 Summary: const syntax for member functions needs better description Product: D Version: 2.021 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 2494] describe explicit casting of arrays

2008-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2494 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-06 13:26 --- Huh, I would've expected it to be documented somewhere. But yes, it's legal, and will throw a runtime error if there is a size mismatch (that is, if the size of the array in

[Issue 2496] New: zlib stream class

2008-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2496 Summary: zlib stream class Product: D Version: 2.021 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Phobos

[Issue 2497] New: delete and null relationship needs more details

2008-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2497 Summary: delete and null relationship needs more details Product: D Version: 2.021 Platform: PC URL: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/expression.html#DeleteE xpression

[Issue 2497] delete and null relationship needs more details

2008-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2497 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Issue 2497] delete and null relationship needs more details

2008-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2497 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-06 18:49 --- (In reply to comment #1) 2. No, because do has no access to variable a. However, it were declared as ref, it would. OK, this is what I thought. What happens when you

[Issue 2497] delete and null relationship needs more details

2008-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2497 --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-06 19:00 --- It's undefined. Comparing to Java doesn't make much sense here, since the only way an object can go away in Java is if no references refer to it, so there's no way to have a

[Issue 2497] delete and null relationship needs more details

2008-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2497 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-06 23:23 --- (In reply to comment #3) It's undefined. Comparing to Java doesn't make much sense here, since the only way an object can go away in Java is if no references refer to