http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2561
Summary: Function return values cannot be used as "ref const"
parameters
Product: D
Version: 2.023
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2560
lud...@informatik.uni-luebeck.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lud...@informatik.uni-
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2561
lud...@informatik.uni-luebeck.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Reso
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1375
--- Comment #4 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-01-07 08:32 ---
This works for me in 1.039.
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2562
Summary: foreach over uninitialized array fails in CTFE
Product: D
Version: 1.039
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2560
s...@extrawurst.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@extrawurst.org
--- Com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2563
Summary: Derived class is implicitly castable to Base class when
inherited privately
Product: D
Version: 2.023
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2564
Summary: CTFE: the index in a tuple foreach is uninitialized
(bogus error)
Product: D
Version: 2.023
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2563
--- Comment #1 from jarrett.billings...@gmail.com 2009-01-07 14:10 ---
Why is public/private/protected inheritance even supported? I think this is
more a strange artifact in the compiler/grammar than anything else. When you
don't ha
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2563
s...@extrawurst.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@extrawurst.org
--- Com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2563
--- Comment #3 from 2kor...@gmail.com 2009-01-07 14:29 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Why is public/private/protected inheritance even supported? I think this is
> more a strange artifact in the compiler/grammar than anything else.
d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2563
--- Comment #3 from 2kor...@gmail.com 2009-01-07 14:29 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Why is public/private/protected inheritance even supported? I think this is
more a strange artifact in the compiler
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2565
Summary: Interface methods need to be implemented even if base
class already have them impelemented
Product: D
Version: 2.023
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Statu
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2565
--- Comment #1 from shro8...@vandals.uidaho.edu 2009-01-07 14:38 ---
This is working as designed. It chould be converted to "enhancement" or closed
as invalid
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2565
2kor...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #2 fr
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2565
--- Comment #3 from s...@iname.com 2009-01-07 15:13 ---
*** Bug 2539 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2539
s...@iname.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@iname.com
Status|RESOL
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2539
s...@iname.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2565
shro8...@vandals.uidaho.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|enhancement |normal
--- Comment
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2565
s...@iname.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@iname.com
Severity|norma
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2566
Summary: compiler segfault from TypeTuple
Product: D
Version: 1.038
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2563
s...@iname.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@iname.com
Keywords|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2560
--- Comment #3 from dran...@free.fr 2009-01-07 16:48 ---
Though I'm not sure why, I guess this is related:
struct Foo {
int x, y, z;
this(int dummy) {}
}
invariant(Foo) createFoo() {
return cast(invariant) Foo(0);
}
v
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2500
wbax...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2567
Summary: Option To Not Treat Warnings As Errors
Product: D
Version: 1.039
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
C
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2568
Summary: Warning Inside Template Causes Instantiation Error
Product: D
Version: 1.039
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity:
26 matches
Mail list logo