http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=259
--- Comment #3 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-02-23 02:28 ---
Note that it's critical than any fix for this bug should not make code like the
following fail to compile:
uint a = 5;
if (a > 2) { ... }
Otherwise the cure would be wors
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=259
--- Comment #4 from ddparn...@bigpond.com 2009-02-23 02:34 ---
Even more critical, any fix for this bug should not make code like the
following fail to compile:
uint a = 5;
if (a > -2) { ... }
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=259
--- Comment #5 from 2kor...@gmail.com 2009-02-23 07:40 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Even more critical, any fix for this bug should not make code like the
> following fail to compile:
>
> uint a = 5;
> if (a > -2) { ... }
>
Why no
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=259
--- Comment #6 from jarrett.billings...@gmail.com 2009-02-23 07:53 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > uint a = 5;
> > if (a > -2) { ... }
> >
>
> Why not? This is obviously a bug!
Agreed. I can't tell you how many times I've done som