[Issue 3171] % not implemented correctly for floats

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3171 Don changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au --- Comment #2 from Don

[Issue 3171] % not implemented correctly for floats

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3171 --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright 2009-07-14 02:27:46 PDT --- Thanks for the explanation. At least I know why that happens, now. What do you suggest, then? Staying with FPREM or going with FPREM1 ? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremag

[Issue 3050] Allow exception in CTFE (patch)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3050 --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright 2009-07-14 03:02:14 PDT --- Wow! -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 3171] % not implemented correctly for floats

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3171 --- Comment #4 from Don 2009-07-14 04:03:19 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Thanks for the explanation. At least I know why that happens, now. What do you > suggest, then? Staying with FPREM or going with FPREM1 ? It's hard to justify in

[Issue 2716] Confusion of auto and scope as the class attribute

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2716 --- Comment #9 from Stewart Gordon 2009-07-14 05:38:02 PDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > > "storage class has no effect" seems to be the wrong wording. > > I'll change it if you come up with a nicer error message. "cannot be auto" > would'

[Issue 2716] Confusion of auto and scope as the class attribute

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2716 --- Comment #10 from Stewart Gordon 2009-07-14 05:40:37 PDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > How about "both auto and explicit type given"? Or even "both auto and explicit type given, use scope for RAII" for the benefit of returning D progra

[Issue 2716] Confusion of auto and scope as the class attribute

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2716 --- Comment #11 from Christian Kamm 2009-07-14 09:35:40 PDT --- I've switched the error message to "both auto and explicit type given". auto class C {} will still trigger the "storage class has no effect" one though. I don't think error mes

[Issue 3174] New: (ICE): Compiler crash or compiler error with auto returns and const / immutable / invarient / pure

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3174 Summary: (ICE): Compiler crash or compiler error with auto returns and const / immutable / invarient / pure Product: D Version: 2.031 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows

[Issue 2716] Confusion of auto and scope as the class attribute

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2716 --- Comment #12 from Stewart Gordon 2009-07-14 10:23:04 PDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > I've switched the error message to "both auto and explicit type given". auto > class C {} will still trigger the "storage class has no effect" one t

[Issue 3175] New: rejects templated ref return function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3175 Summary: rejects templated ref return function Product: D Version: 2.031 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Issue 3171] % not implemented correctly for floats

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3171 --- Comment #5 from Walter Bright 2009-07-14 15:15:10 PDT --- We're not breaking with C because C has no % operator for floats. But I agree we should match C99's fmod behavior, which is its current behavior. -- Configure issuemail: http:/

[Issue 3163] Never referenced local variable compiles without error.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3163 Stewart Gordon changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid URL|

[Issue 3165] What kind of integer division does D use?

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3165 Stewart Gordon changed: What|Removed |Added URL|http://www.digitalmars.com/ |http://www.digitalmars.com/

[Issue 3176] New: Out of Memory error on poorly formed recurrence function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3176 Summary: Out of Memory error on poorly formed recurrence function Product: D Version: 2.031 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor

[Issue 3170] Forward reference of nested class fails if outer class is abstract or derived

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3170 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment