[Issue 3196] Segfault(mtype.c) almost any error involving a delegate inside a function

2009-08-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3196 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Segfault(mtype.c) Bad |Segfault(mtype.c) almost |struc

[Issue 3196] Segfault(mtype.c) almost any error involving a delegate inside a function

2009-08-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3196 --- Comment #3 from Don 2009-08-06 00:00:57 PDT --- *** Issue 3227 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Issue 3228] Segfault(mtype.c) multiple empty delegates

2009-08-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3228 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 3196] Segfault(mtype.c) almost any error involving a delegate inside a function

2009-08-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3196 --- Comment #4 from Don 2009-08-06 00:01:17 PDT --- *** Issue 3228 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Issue 3227] Segfault(mtype.c) anonymous delegate with void parameter

2009-08-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3227 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 3167] Passing result of a function call as ref argument no longer works

2009-08-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3167 Don changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au --- Comment #4 from Don

[Issue 3167] Passing result of a function call as ref argument no longer works

2009-08-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3167 Bill Baxter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wbax...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from

[Issue 3167] Passing result of a function call as ref argument no longer works

2009-08-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3167 --- Comment #6 from Don 2009-08-06 12:24:14 PDT --- This change is clearly caused by the addition of the new function Expression *CallExp::modifiableLvalue(Scope *sc, Expression *e) in expression.c. Comment it out to restore the old behavi

[Issue 3229] No return or assert(0) at end of function

2009-08-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3229 --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright 2009-08-06 13:04:34 PDT --- Thank you, that hits the spot! -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 3168] Declaring structs as incomplete types no longer works

2009-08-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3168 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch, rejects-valid CC|

[Issue 1311] DMD 1.018: Fix for bug657 breaks other code

2009-08-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1311 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 3231] New: Function declared to return a type with its same name doesn't compile

2009-08-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3231 Summary: Function declared to return a type with its same name doesn't compile Product: D Version: 2.032 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keyword

[Issue 3231] Function declared to return a type with its same name doesn't compile

2009-08-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3231 --- Comment #1 from Tim M 2009-08-06 16:37:53 PDT --- The error reported: test.d(11): Error: function test.Foo.Bar is used as a type -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving t

[Issue 3231] Function declared to return a type with its same name doesn't compile

2009-08-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3231 --- Comment #2 from Tim M 2009-08-06 16:52:53 PDT --- Sorry I shouldn't have rushed this but it if I provide the implementation it makes no difference. Are we meant to be allowed a function with the same name as its return type or is this a

[Issue 3231] Function declared to return a type with its same name doesn't compile

2009-08-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3231 Jarrett Billingsley changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 3231] Function declared to return a type with its same name doesn't compile

2009-08-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3231 BCS changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shro8...@vandals.uidaho.edu --- Comment #4 fro

[Issue 3231] Function declared to return a type with its same name doesn't compile

2009-08-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3231 Cristi Vlasceanu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||crist...@zerobugs.org --- Comment

[Issue 3231] Function declared to return a type with its same name doesn't compile

2009-08-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3231 --- Comment #6 from Jarrett Billingsley 2009-08-06 22:22:05 PDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > The bug was filed as a blocker for the .net implementation because there are > cases like this System.Text.RegularExpressions that has a static M