[Issue 3680] default struct constructor should not be removed

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3680 Don changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au Severity|normal

[Issue 3699] Feature Request: while-else

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3699 Don changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au Severity|normal

[Issue 3680] default struct constructor should not be removed

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3680 --- Comment #4 from Michel Nolard 2010-01-15 03:13:06 PST --- Ok. I clearly see your point now, and it is both practical and logical ... and I agree ! This would be quite an improvement for a lot of situations. What bothers me is this : > To

[Issue 3403] compiler dies with -X option

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3403 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 2601] Extraneous cast introduced in member access

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2601 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |rejects-valid Version|2.000

[Issue 1931] dmd doesn't enforce users to use assert(0) for noreturn func

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1931 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 2278] Guarantee alignment of stack-allocated variables on x86

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2278 Don changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bary...@smp.if.uj.edu.pl --- Comment #6 from Don

[Issue 1847] Structs aren't aligned on stack

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1847 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 2630] ddoc should be able to document unittests

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2630 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |2.038 Severity|normal

[Issue 1396] lazy void tuple breaks

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1396 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 2854] Empty struct constructor in const causes crash

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2854 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|NEW

[Issue 3708] ImportExpression should be clear on how file is found

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3708 Leandro Lucarella changed: What|Removed |Added CC||llu...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 fr

[Issue 1652] problem with /// generating strange output

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1652 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 1117] ddoc generates corrupted docs if code examples contain attributes with colons

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1117 Don changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrmoc...@gmx.de --- Comment #5 from Don 2010-01

[Issue 1914] Array initialisation from const array yeilds memory trample

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1914 Don changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au Severity|major

[Issue 2127] inliner turns struct "return *this" from by-value into by-ref

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2127 Don changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au Severity|major

[Issue 3680] default struct constructor should not be removed

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3680 --- Comment #5 from ibrahim YANIKLAR 2010-01-15 08:43:21 PST --- > What bothers me is this : > > To remove static opCall's completely is another subject... I will explain that by opening a new issue. > A case which needs clarification, by th

[Issue 3680] default struct constructor should not be removed

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3680 --- Comment #6 from ibrahim YANIKLAR 2010-01-15 09:57:39 PST --- Also "this(int a = 0)" and "static ... opCall(int a = 0)" should be prohibited. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are re

[Issue 3709] New: Associative array of associative arrays gets confused

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3709 Summary: Associative array of associative arrays gets confused Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Pri

[Issue 3680] default struct constructor should not be removed

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3680 --- Comment #7 from Don 2010-01-15 11:45:32 PST --- (In reply to comment #6) > Also "this(int a = 0)" and "static ... opCall(int a = 0)" should be > prohibited. That's bug 3438. I think the underlying issue is, that we need this() with no par

[Issue 2451] Cannot add a Variant to associative array

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2451 David Simcha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dsim...@yahoo.com --- Comment #2 from D

[Issue 2451] Cannot add a Variant to associative array

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2451 --- Comment #3 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2010-01-15 13:16:14 PST --- Perfect timing, thanks. I just ran into that but had no time to investigate. The type Tuple!(uint, "count", float, "distance")[uint] does not work, but the type S[uint] (where

[Issue 3709] Associative array of associative arrays gets confused

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3709 Leandro Lucarella changed: What|Removed |Added CC||llu...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 fr

[Issue 856] foreach doesn't work when accessing elements as supertypes

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=856 Alexey Ivanov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 3710] New: Typo in allMembers description?

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3710 Summary: Typo in allMembers description? Product: D Version: 2.038 Platform: All URL: http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/traits.html#TraitsExpress ion OS/Version: All

[Issue 3711] New: Ddoc does not generate nothing if std.stdio is imported

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3711 Summary: Ddoc does not generate nothing if std.stdio is imported Product: D Version: 2.038 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal