http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3785
Summary: std.random.uniform(bound,uint,uint)(uint.min,uint.max)
fails.
Product: D
Version: 2.039
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: nor
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3781
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code, patch
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3781
--- Comment #2 from Don 2010-02-09 01:21:47 PST ---
Oops, there's a missing parentheses. Should be:
if (tf->varargs && arguments && ((parameters && arguments->dim !=
parameters->dim) || (!parameters && arguments->dim)))
--
Configure issuemai
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3786
Summary: bug in std.string.removechars
Product: D
Version: 2.039
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Pho
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3775
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|2.040 |1.00
Summary|Segfault(cast.c): on
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3787
Summary: clarification: assigment to 'this'
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Componen
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3787
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||and...@metalanguage.com
--- Comm
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3782
--- Comment #4 from Sean Kelly 2010-02-09 09:29:32 PST
---
I'd like to use the latest revision of the spec. Work on the headers simply
began before 2008 :-)
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
-
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3155
--- Comment #4 from Sean Kelly 2010-02-09 09:46:41 PST
---
The correct approach may be to have a separate Druntime for each compiler.
This is a bit less granular than the previous design where multiple compiler
runtimes could be plugged into
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3787
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
Severity|major
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3788
Summary: UTCtoLocal donts works
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3155
Brad Roberts changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bra...@puremagic.com
--- Comment #5 fro
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3775
--- Comment #2 from Don 2010-02-09 11:28:25 PST ---
ROOT CAUSE: This is an interaction between IFTI and property syntax.
PATCH: At the end of CastExp::semantic, make sure that the function has a type.
Index: expression.c
=
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3789
Summary: comparing a struct with an array member does a bitwise
compare
Product: D
Version: 2.040
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: no
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3155
--- Comment #6 from Trass3r 2010-02-09 12:54:20 PST ---
Couldn't those parts that are compiler-specific be held in their own subfolders
or whatever to keep it clean?
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=emai
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3789
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
--- Comment #1 from Don 2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3789
--- Comment #2 from Steven Schveighoffer 2010-02-09
14:37:33 PST ---
that is an unimportant technical difference. The semantic meaning of the
feature is that if you have a type T, and a struct S fully defined as:
struct S
{
T member;
}
Th
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3155
--- Comment #7 from Sean Kelly 2010-02-09 17:45:04 PST
---
They were in their own folder, in fact, there was a 'compiler' folder with
subfolders for each compiler, but the structure was deemed unnecessarily
complicated when the only compiler s
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3155
--- Comment #8 from Sean Kelly 2010-02-09 17:50:28 PST
---
For what it's worth, part of the problem is that the path to a module must
correspond to the package name. This makes the SVN structure a lot more
complicated when there are two compi
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3790
Summary: [OOP] constructor of child class cannot pass arguments
into parent constructor
Product: D
Version: 2.041
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3789
iorlas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||denis.tomi...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from i
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3786
--- Comment #1 from Igor Lesik 2010-02-09 18:50:30 PST ---
Just in case, the correct version of the function might look like:
string removechars(string s, in string pattern)
{
char[] r;
bool changed = false;
foreach (size_t i, dch
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3790
--- Comment #1 from iorlas 2010-02-09 20:05:05 PST ---
Also, if we dont give argument a default value, we get an error:
Error: constructor main.B.this no match for implicit super() call in
constructor
As i think, somebody thinks in different wa
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3791
Summary: Reference anonymous nested classes when describing new
expressions
Product: D
Version: 2.040
Platform: All
URL: http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/expression.html#New
24 matches
Mail list logo
