[Issue 3701] Incorrect initialisation of static arrays of floating-point values

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3701 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au ---

[Issue 3803] compiler segfaults

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3803 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au ---

[Issue 3701] Incorrect initialisation of static arrays of floating-point values

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3701 --- Comment #2 from Lars T. Kyllingstad bugzi...@kyllingen.net 2010-02-15 01:28:56 PST --- Well, I'll be... Now I can't reproduce it either -- not even with DMD 2.039, which was the version I was using when I reported the bug. I swear, I

[Issue 3802] Error message without line number when using struct initializers for a struct with constructors.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3802 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3662] Wrong compile error within struct constructor and C-style initializer

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3662 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lud...@informatik.uni-luebe

[Issue 3804] New: Recent versions of GNU C Library have execvpe() implemented.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3804 Summary: Recent versions of GNU C Library have execvpe() implemented. Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW

[Issue 3701] Incorrect initialisation of static arrays of floating-point values

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3701 ggcod...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ggcod...@gmail.com --- Comment #3

[Issue 2451] Adding structs that use opAssign or postblit to an AA is broken

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2451 GG ggcod...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ggcod...@gmail.com --- Comment

[Issue 3745] Linking error with associative array of arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3745 --- Comment #1 from Alexey Ivanov aifg...@gmail.com 2010-02-15 12:50:16 PST --- If rewrite a.d as: module a; class A { private int[][int] n; public int[] foo() { return n.keys; } public int[][int] foo() {

[Issue 3805] New: std.format writeUpToFormatSpec function has subtle loop index bug, will drop character after a %%

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3805 Summary: std.format writeUpToFormatSpec function has subtle loop index bug, will drop character after a %% Product: D Version: 2.040 Platform: All OS/Version: All

[Issue 3806] New: TypeInfo_Const has member base in object_.d and member next in object.di

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3806 Summary: TypeInfo_Const has member base in object_.d and member next in object.di Product: D Version: 2.040 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW

[Issue 3807] New: typedef still listed as keyword, but not present anywhere in grammar

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3807 Summary: typedef still listed as keyword, but not present anywhere in grammar Product: D Version: 2.040 Platform: All URL: http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/lex.html

[Issue 3805] std.format writeUpToFormatSpec function has subtle loop index bug, will drop character after a %%

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3805 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED