[Issue 3920] Assertion failure: '0' on line 10018 in file 'expression.c'

2010-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3920 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Issue 3884] Segfault: defining a typedef with an invalid object.d

2010-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3884 Matti Niemenmaa matti.niemenmaa+dbugzi...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code

[Issue 3929] GC.free() creates subtle bugs

2010-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3929 Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3930] AAs horribly broken

2010-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3930 Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3930] AAs horribly broken

2010-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3930 Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3898] access violation with associative arrays

2010-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3898 Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3898] access violation with associative arrays

2010-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3898 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2010-03-11 05:42:04 PST --- Somehow I could not reproduce it with this test case, but it still happened with the larger project that showed the problem to begin with. After applying your

[Issue 3898] access violation with associative arrays

2010-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3898 Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3930] AAs horribly broken

2010-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3930 Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3932] New: Title: A forward declaration error with a struct.init

2010-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3932 Summary: Title: A forward declaration error with a struct.init Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority:

[Issue 3867] Regression(1.051): forward referenced enum member via an alias, templates, and is()

2010-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3867 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|pragma(msg) with a forward |Regression(1.051): forward

[Issue 3808] Assertion Failure : Assertion failure: 'classinfo-structsize == CLASSINFO_SIZE' on line 870 in file 'toobj.c'

2010-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3808 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Issue 3933] New: Array memory allocation error lacks a line number

2010-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3933 Summary: Array memory allocation error lacks a line number Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: diagnostic Severity:

[Issue 3914] Struct as argument that fits in register has member accessed wrong

2010-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3914 --- Comment #1 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-03-11 12:51:37 PST --- Here's a slightly reduced test case which doesn't require any compiler flags. Not a regression, fails even on DMD0.165. It's a problem with variadic function parameters

[Issue 3851] Array copy error message with no line number

2010-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3851 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |enhancement --- Comment #1

[Issue 3934] New: Some untidy attributes

2010-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3934 Summary: Some untidy attributes Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: accepts-invalid, rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Issue 3921] Compile time evaluation requirements not well-specified

2010-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3921 --- Comment #2 from Jerry Quinn jlqu...@optonline.net 2010-03-11 15:21:50 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) Quoting the spec: In order to be executed at compile time, the function must appear in a context where it must be so executed

[Issue 3929] GC.free() creates subtle bugs

2010-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3929 --- Comment #4 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2010-03-11 16:41:52 PST --- What about the issue of unnecessary GC retention of (possibly large) arrays? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ---

[Issue 3935] New: opBinary is instantiated with =

2010-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3935 Summary: opBinary is instantiated with = Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD

[Issue 3935] opBinary is instantiated with =

2010-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3935 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---

[Issue 3929] GC.free() creates subtle bugs

2010-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3929 --- Comment #5 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2010-03-11 18:08:26 PST --- The cache actually depends on it. If the block info in the cache is freed and then reallocated as smaller blocks, using append may utilize a stale

[Issue 3929] Interactions between LRU array cache, memory recycling

2010-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3929 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|GC.free() creates subtle|Interactions between

[Issue 3929] Interactions between LRU array cache, memory recycling

2010-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3929 --- Comment #7 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2010-03-11 19:07:16 PST --- Well, there are really two issues here: What happens when GC.free() gets called and what happens when the GC collects. As much as people (Andrei comes to mind)

[Issue 3791] Reference anonymous nested classes when describing new expressions

2010-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3791 --- Comment #1 from Jerry Quinn jlqu...@optonline.net 2010-03-11 19:50:00 PST --- A couple of words should be associated with PostfixExpression as well, since that's where nested class new syntax actually shows up in the grammar. --