[Issue 4028] delegates with differing default arguments lead to same template instantiation

2010-04-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4028 --- Comment #2 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-04-04 03:48:24 PDT --- I decided that this bug can't be fixed. Even if you'd try to make it behave correctly, you would somehow have to include the default arguments expressions into the name mangling

[Issue 4028] delegates with differing default arguments lead to same template instantiation

2010-04-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4028 --- Comment #3 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-04-04 03:53:30 PDT --- Before I'm trying to forget this bug while cursing dmd to hell and inventing awkward, code-inflating work arounds in my code, here's a simpler test case that demonstrates the bug:

[Issue 2590] Deallocator is not called if constructor fails.

2010-04-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2590 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au ---

[Issue 4049] enum constant with no initializer

2010-04-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4049 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 4047] [CTFE] class/struct heap allocation

2010-04-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4047 --- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-04-04 07:56:58 PDT --- This is a (possibly silly) idea for a low-priority enhancement, to allow the allocation of class instances at compile-time. This can be useful because their creation time

[Issue 2995] Incorrect conversion in c ? a : b

2010-04-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2995 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #1 from

[Issue 2590] Deallocator is not called if constructor fails.

2010-04-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2590 --- Comment #2 from Max Samukha samu...@voliacable.com 2010-04-04 10:07:51 PDT --- He is talking about constructors/destructors, not allocators/deallocators. I totally agree the destructor must not be called on a partially constructed object.

[Issue 2590] Deallocator is not called if constructor fails.

2010-04-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2590 Justin Spahr-Summers justin.spahrsumm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 2590] Deallocator is not called if constructor fails.

2010-04-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2590 --- Comment #4 from Max Samukha samu...@voliacable.com 2010-04-04 15:17:17 PDT --- The current behavior seems reasonable, because 'delete' is never invoked on the object (which is necessary for a custom deallocator to be used). I don't

[Issue 4060] New: Phobos + linux problems with files 2GB

2010-04-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4060 Summary: Phobos + linux problems with files 2GB Product: D Version: 1.057 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2

[Issue 2590] Deallocator is not called if constructor fails.

2010-04-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2590 --- Comment #5 from Justin Spahr-Summers justin.spahrsumm...@gmail.com 2010-04-04 18:09:04 CDT --- (In reply to comment #4) The current behavior seems reasonable, because 'delete' is never invoked on the object (which is necessary for a

[Issue 4061] New: Eponymous template templates don't work without aliases

2010-04-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4061 Summary: Eponymous template templates don't work without aliases Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: