[Issue 4103] New: opAssign signature rules not enforced on templated opAssign

2010-04-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4103 Summary: opAssign signature rules not enforced on templated opAssign Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 4103] opAssign signature rules not enforced on templated opAssign

2010-04-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4103 Lars T. Kyllingstad bugzi...@kyllingen.net changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Issue 4091] Small docs page about dynamic array implementation

2010-04-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4091 --- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-04-19 01:14:03 PDT --- I don't understand what your point it. D dynamic arrays are not simple things, they contain pointers, length, the GC keeps the length of the allocated memory, they have a

[Issue 4104] New: No way to get notified about D runtime termination.

2010-04-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4104 Summary: No way to get notified about D runtime termination. Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical

[Issue 3971] Syntax semantics for array assigns

2010-04-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3971 --- Comment #6 from Sobirari Muhomori dfj1es...@sneakemail.com 2010-04-19 14:11:17 PDT --- Why c=a; is an error? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Issue 3971] Syntax semantics for array assigns

2010-04-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3971 --- Comment #7 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-04-19 14:42:31 PDT --- You are right, the c=a; case can be allowed, it can just copy the ptr and length of the static array inside the struct of the dynamic array (this is how D currently works).

[Issue 3971] Syntax semantics for array assigns

2010-04-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3971 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au ---

[Issue 4105] New: Stack overflow involving alias template parameters and undefined identifier

2010-04-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4105 Summary: Stack overflow involving alias template parameters and undefined identifier Product: D Version: 2.040 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW

[Issue 4101] DMD doesn't give error when goto skips initialization

2010-04-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4101 --- Comment #2 from Jerry Quinn jlqu...@optonline.net 2010-04-19 17:56:44 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Is this the same as bug 602? It's related. There's an implicit init being accepted here. However, there are 2 explicit inits being