[Issue 3817] Array op: wrong error message

2010-05-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3817 Don changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au --- Comment #4 from Don 2

[Issue 3064] Invalid array operation accepted, generates bad code

2010-05-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3064 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 3064] Invalid array operation accepted, generates bad code

2010-05-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3064 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Issue 3064] Invalid array operation accepted, generates bad code

2010-05-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3064 --- Comment #3 from Don 2010-05-03 04:34:59 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Reopened, because this wrong code compiles still with dmd v2.044, the bug > persists: > > void main() { > int[] a = [1,2]; > int[] b = [1,2]; > a[] += b

[Issue 4152] New: Function alias forward reference error

2010-05-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4152 Summary: Function alias forward reference error Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: norm

[Issue 4153] New: Code coverage output improvement

2010-05-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4153 Summary: Code coverage output improvement Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Compo

[Issue 4154] New: Incorrect DWARF section names on Mac

2010-05-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4154 Summary: Incorrect DWARF section names on Mac Product: D Version: future Platform: Other OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Com

[Issue 4155] New: return of NaN to temporary fails equality test

2010-05-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4155 Summary: return of NaN to temporary fails equality test Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P

[Issue 3847] To avoid a C code bug

2010-05-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3847 --- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-05-03 10:45:16 PDT --- and, or operators exist in C++: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iso646.h This C++ code compiles: #include "stdio.h" #include "stdlib.h" int main() { bool a = atoi("1");

[Issue 3847] To avoid a C code bug

2010-05-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3847 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #

[Issue 3847] To avoid a C code bug

2010-05-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3847 Adam D. Ruppe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||destructiona...@gmail.com --- Comment

[Issue 3847] To avoid a C code bug

2010-05-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3847 --- Comment #7 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-05-03 12:10:07 PDT --- In C++ no one used them. But it can be just a matter of nudging D programmers in the right direction with the style guide and commonly accepted idioms for writing D code fist

[Issue 3847] To avoid a C code bug

2010-05-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3847 Brad Roberts changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bra...@puremagic.com --- Comment #8 fro

[Issue 3847] To avoid a C code bug

2010-05-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3847 Ary Borenszweig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@esperanto.org.ar --- Comment #9

[Issue 4156] New: Segfault with array+=array

2010-05-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4156 Summary: Segfault with array+=array Product: D Version: 2.034 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, patch Severity: normal

[Issue 4157] New: C time functions `localtime_r` and `gmtime_r` are not exposed by core.stdc.time.

2010-05-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4157 Summary: C time functions `localtime_r` and `gmtime_r` are not exposed by core.stdc.time. Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Issue 4157] C time functions `localtime_r` and `gmtime_r` are not exposed by core.stdc.time.

2010-05-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4157 --- Comment #1 from Bernard Helyer 2010-05-03 21:11:44 PDT --- And justification for placing them under 'Posix': http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/localtime_r.html -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/

[Issue 3847] To avoid a C code bug

2010-05-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3847 --- Comment #10 from Walter Bright 2010-05-03 21:14:14 PDT --- Just today on reddit I saw: "I'm a bit embarrassed that after 10 years with C++ I learned something from a 12-bullet post intended for those new to the language. I'm amazed to lea